Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel touts Pentium D
The Bosh ^ | May 28, 2005 | By Editor

Posted on 05/28/2005 7:46:54 AM PDT by Afronaut

May 28, 2005

Intel touts Pentium D
By Editor

Intel touts Pentium D
" I won't say it is as exciting as the Internet was about 10 years ago, but it comes pretty close," Gerald Holzhammer.

Intel has announced the launch of its new dual-core processor, Pentium D, for use in desktop PCs. The Pentium D is Intel's second dual-core processor, following the introduction of the Pentium Extreme Edition in April and comes just a few days ahead of rival AMD's launch of the Athlon 64x2 dual core PC chip. The new Pentium D 840, 830, and 820 chips are less expensive than the Pentium Extreme Edition, and will introduce dual-core technology to far more users than the Extreme Edition chip.

"We're shipping 100,000 this quarter, and we're going to ship millions by the end of the year," said Gerald Holzhammer, vice president of Intel's Digital Home Group. "This is a big deal for us. It's the first time dual core will make a real impact on the marketplace."

The new platforms introduced for home and office PCs, combine hardware and software technologies that are designed to provide consumers with enhanced PC security, system management and collaboration capabilities.


The 945 chip set contains Intel's Active Management Technology (AMT) that will allow IT managers to remotely manage workstations even when they are shut down. With AMT one will be able to download software updates onto a PC and even take inventory of their network through a protected part of the technology that is transparent to the user reports Earth Times.


Pentium D prices range from $241 to $530 with speeds from 2.8 gigahertz to 3.2 GHz. Supporting chipsets range from $38 to $42. The new processor and chip set will be outfitted in business desktops produced by HP, Dell and Lenovo. Dell's new Dimension 9100 supports either the dual-core 800 series chips or the 600 series Pentium 4 chips. Hewlett-Packard is making the dual-core 800 processors available on several existing models in its Pavilion lineup. Lenovo Group's ThinkCentre A52 and M52 desktops will be available later this year with the dual-core processors and the new chip sets reports PC World.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: computers; intel; pc; privacy; technology; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: SamAdams76

I used to have a professor who seemed obsessed with robots gaining consciousness and what that would mean. I wanted to ask him if he had ever seen "The Terminator".


21 posted on 05/28/2005 9:21:26 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (Government IS the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

Colossus


22 posted on 05/28/2005 9:27:50 AM PDT by dannyc1 (I'm just happy to be a part of it all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I didn't ask a question, I am aware of the process and workings of Google Desktop Search.

"Secondly, I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but no one really cares what is on your hard drive; except for hackers and gov't agencies with a search warrent."

Really, only Hackers and The Government could access this information? I guess I have nothing to worry about! You can always trust our Government!

"This data would be sent back upstream via the internet"

Does not have to be if it can be viewed right on the hard drive. Sitting there is a nice file that I was stupid enought to create and serve up.

My main point is that technology is being created for the home user that continues to make access to all personnal information on a hard drive easier to view. Even with out a search warrent.

23 posted on 05/28/2005 9:41:29 AM PDT by Afronaut (America is for Americans, but not anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

You've seen Dune and understood the implications?


24 posted on 05/28/2005 9:50:09 AM PDT by Maigrey (Don't make me call the Emperor on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

So, am I to understand that you are surfing the internet, likely with broadband access; and you do not have a firewall?

No one, and I do mean no one; is going to be digging around in your machine if you spend 5 minutes setting up a firewall. A broadband wireless router will take all of 5 minutes, and will cost you around $50.

If you prefer to pay less; there are software firewalls available for free as a download. Black Ice and Zone Alarm come to mind as pretty easy to use and 'free' software downloads.

Then, there is also the free and built-in firewall in WindowsXP.

If you are connected to the internet, and are not using a firewall; the gov't is the least of your worries.


25 posted on 05/28/2005 10:05:35 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dannyc1
Colossus

Dr. Forbin, I presume.

26 posted on 05/28/2005 10:37:31 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
What kind of Firewall are you using a NAT (Network Address Translation) Static or dynamic? Are you safe? Can it be compromised? It is password protected correct?

But my favorite question to people is when you use the MS update utility in XP, and the screen pops and asks, "No information is being transmitted to Microsoft at this time, do you believe that?

You would be impressed with my setup. I ran a Hardware site for 4 years. I gave it up because the curve flattened on impressive performance increases. I got bored with 4% increases for 500 bucks.

27 posted on 05/28/2005 11:40:02 AM PDT by Afronaut (America is for Americans, but not anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I'm holding out for the Terahertz chip myself.

Any relation to the Terezaheinz chip?

28 posted on 05/28/2005 11:43:22 AM PDT by streetpreacher (God DOES exist; He's just not into you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Secondly, I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but no one really cares what is on your hard drive... If Google got caught (like RealNetworks has .... twice) searching hard drives...

Your second point contradicts your first assertion.

29 posted on 05/28/2005 11:45:53 AM PDT by streetpreacher (God DOES exist; He's just not into you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
If no one cares about whats on my hard drive, why is there a billion dollar industry in place to protect my hard drive?

My whole point AGAIN, why are users making it so easy for people to gather information?

30 posted on 05/28/2005 1:24:30 PM PDT by Afronaut (America is for Americans, but not anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
Your second point contradicts your first assertion.

Not when you consider the fines/fees assessed to Real Network; and the fact that there are now numerous non-Real Network players for the .ram format. If you take a look at how Real Networks was (notice past tense) increasing in market share, and now is a non-market dominate force; you can see that the company forfeited consumer trust and goodwill for a short term and short sighted gain. RealNetworks is not considering Bankruptcy ... this would indicate to me that they have made some stupid decisions in the past that eroded consumer confidence. Now it's time to pay the piper.

""The free version of RealJukebox, which has about 13.5 million registered users, prompts new users for their names and e-mail addresses before they are assigned an identifying number," according to an E-Commerce Times story by Mary Hillebrand on November 9, 1999. Talk about a substantial market research survey group! "

Link

31 posted on 05/28/2005 2:40:46 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

The significance of the original article is that dual processors are going to become standard in a year. This is an incredible leap for regular users especially since the 2.8GHz is so inexpensive ($241). If you have ever used a dual machine, you know what I mean. Everything runs *very* smoothly. My old el cheapo dual Celeron 400MHz machine was smoother than my newer P4 2.26GHz machine.


32 posted on 05/28/2005 2:49:21 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

I won't buy anything called "Extreme" or "Xtreme" or "Rad", just on principle.


33 posted on 05/28/2005 2:50:53 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson