Bold and underlining added by me -- if any of it survived the excerpting process required by the
Times. I could only post 300 words of the article.
Everyone be nice.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 280 names. See the list's description at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
05/28/2005 4:51:47 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
OMG! The fundamentalist materialists will riot!
4 posted on
05/28/2005 5:00:08 AM PDT by
Duke Nukum
(Listen up Moore-ons: Newsweek Lied and People Died)
To: PatrickHenry
"Evolution has become a major battleground"
Did they mean to say "Intelligent design has become a major battleground"
The former is pretty much settled for most. :-)
To: PatrickHenry
Evolution and Intelligent Design both have their place, and can live peacefully side by side if thinking people would give both a chance to do so.
10 posted on
05/28/2005 5:58:43 AM PDT by
Noachian
(To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
To: PatrickHenry
The Smithsonian is in the business of chronicling American culture which they do in minute and sometimes excruciating detail. They'd have to be brain dead NOT to have something about this.
11 posted on
05/28/2005 6:01:46 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: PatrickHenry
The Smithsonian is in the business of chronicling American culture [and history] ..
12 posted on
05/28/2005 6:02:34 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: PatrickHenry
For 16 thousand dollars they could use my living room, but I guess the Smithsonian has more seats.
13 posted on
05/28/2005 6:20:05 AM PDT by
VadeRetro
( Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: PatrickHenry
I don't understand why intelligent people argue over this. It doesn't mean anything and neither side can know, or prove, their point to the other. Both views are taken as a matter of faith.
21 posted on
05/28/2005 8:54:34 AM PDT by
Abcdefg
To: PatrickHenry
Reading the text, it is clear that the Creatards at DI purchased this opportunity. Thus, the headline should not read "Smithsonian to Screen a Movie That Makes a Case Against Evolution", it should read, "Creationists to Screen a Movie Critical of Evolution at the Smithsonian."
To: PatrickHenry
"Evolution has become a major battleground in the culture wars" Considering that both sides are vigorously represented here on FR, the bastion of the "Right," that statement is misleading.
BTW, how close are we to getting a final decision on this?
43 posted on
05/29/2005 2:22:16 PM PDT by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: PatrickHenry
The headline is a bit misleading. The event is privately funded -- i.e., somebody rented the museum for the evening, just as is done for charity balls, weddings, proms, etc. The Smithsonian isn't "screening" the film, they're renting space to someone who is. And I'm sure that they have to allow equal access to anyone who can put up the rental fee, being a public institution. This doesn't mean the Smithsonian has any doubts about Natural Selection.
And if I were them, I'd inventory the exhibits afterwards and check for vandalism.
To: PatrickHenry
57 posted on
05/30/2005 2:59:37 PM PDT by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING: The Pentagon's New Map by Barnett)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson