Monica Almeida/The New York Times
Dawn Buras, a surrogate, was watched over by Anthony Ramos, a prospective father, after undergoing an embryonic
transfer in March.
Posted on 05/27/2005 1:35:59 AM PDT by Cincinna
"...In December, Ms. Stiller gave birth to the baby, named Samantha, for Dr. Friedman and Dr. Wellisch, conceived with a donor egg and the sperm from one of the partners. (They chose not to know which.) In her decision to work with them Ms. Stiller is part of a small but growing movement of surrogate mothers choosing gay couples over traditional families."
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
You mean gay couples can't have children on there own??? I thought it was 'natural' to be gay??
Biology is homophobic.
These social misfits need to get a partner with the proper equipment for the job so the child will have a father and a mother.
I don't think that the discussion of this difficult moral and ethical question of creating embryos for in vitro fertilization, and later use for stem cell research is advanced by smart ass comments about the people in the story.
Why?
Monica Almeida/The New York Times
Dawn Buras, a surrogate, was watched over by Anthony Ramos, a prospective father, after undergoing an embryonic
transfer in March.
Oh she's a piece of work...all "puffed up" shall we say in terms of self importance...obviously posing for the camera!
No matter how hard the reprobate try-- what those who choose the homosexual lifestyle do remains unnatural
and contrary to Gods will.
So this slut. Yes I mean slut. What else can you call a woman who would use her body for an incubator? Take a donor egg and two puddles of sperm, does the eeny meeny miny mo thing to pick which puddle gets to be mixed with the donor egg. Lays around eating bon-bons for 9 months and sells the baby to two queers . Nice work . And you thought it was illegal to sell babies.
There will come a day where these women will stand before God and be shown and judged for what the perverts have done to their children.
"IMHO the only moral and ethical reason for in-vitro is using the egg and sperm of the people involved.
What is smart assed about the truth???"
What I am beginning to question is the creation of embryos for any purpose, since most of them are later destroyed. It is a very complex moral and ethical issue that has nothing to do with homosexuals.
This particular article IMO points up the misuse and abuse when you start down that slippery slope of creating life by artificial means.
Let them just rear each other.
LOL
What does Bearing Babies for Gay Couples have to do with stem cell research. Nothing-so face the truth of the situation. Children need the male and the female role models to follow when growning up.
It is about creating embryos, i.e. human life and using those embryos for un natural means, like the surrogate pregnancy in the article. The same embryos are frozen for later use, and then destroyed.
I question whether artificially creating human life in the first place is not the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.