Skip to comments.
PETER PAUL AND HILLARY: No. 14 – Lying Chart of Sandler Was Like Unwelcome Visiting Relative
DFU in the court room
| 5-26-05
| Doug from Upland
Posted on 05/26/2005 8:35:01 PM PDT by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: doug from upland
Heard you on Tony Snowe this morning.
Great job as usual....only wish you had more time but you managed to score a lot of points in the time you had.
2
posted on
05/26/2005 8:39:50 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Tell Senators to stop judicial filibuster....using FREE number: 1-877-762-8762)
To: doug from upland
I havaen't been following this, but it seems to me that a Clinton-appointed judge would have a conflict of interest.
3
posted on
05/26/2005 8:41:50 PM PDT
by
basil
(Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
To: JulieRNR21
Tony was going to give me some more time, but he ran out of time.
4
posted on
05/26/2005 8:47:33 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: Blurblogger
5
posted on
05/26/2005 8:50:30 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: basil
From my time in court, I didn't see bias.
That having been said, the judge should not have earlier released him from the third count. It could be significant. The judge said the government had no basis to tie Rosen to the final amended report. If they didn't use Rosen's false info, whose info did the judge think they used? Why that may be sigificant is that, prior to the final amended filing on July 30, 2001, Peter Paul had served several defendants, providing copies of checks for the expenses. There was no way that they could claim they didn't know.
6
posted on
05/26/2005 8:53:31 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: Blurblogger
7
posted on
05/26/2005 8:54:22 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: JulieRNR21
Tony Snow would cringe. Spelling his name like RINO Olympia Snowe. :) (I promise not to tell Tony)
Larry Elder makes it clear that his name is not spelled like Joycelyn Elders.
8
posted on
05/26/2005 9:11:17 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: doug from upland
9
posted on
05/26/2005 9:40:44 PM PDT
by
Bullish
To: doug from upland
Tony Snow would cringe. Spelling his name like RINO Olympia Snowe. :) (I promise not to tell Tony)
Oh Doug.... please don't tell him! He's my hero and I think he's just darling!
My excuse is 'force of habit' because recently I have I have sent many emails to that RINO from Maine.......LOL
10
posted on
05/26/2005 10:11:01 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Tell Senators to stop judicial filibuster....using FREE number: 1-877-762-8762)
To: JulieRNR21
I think she actually voted for cloture today in the filibuster against Bolton, didn't she?
Do you listen to Tony's show in the morning?
11
posted on
05/26/2005 10:16:20 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: All
When will their pants burst into flames?
12
posted on
05/26/2005 10:20:12 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: doug from upland
Yes, I try to listen most mornings.....I prefer Tony's show to all the others.
13
posted on
05/26/2005 10:28:33 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Tell Senators to stop judicial filibuster....using FREE number: 1-877-762-8762)
To: Congressman Billybob; Buckhead; Howlin; Nick Danger; Alamo-Girl; Mia T; Peach; backhoe; ...
14
posted on
05/27/2005 6:00:26 AM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Blurblogger
Doug and we freepers may see this fraud situation clearly, but the judge and others don't.
Seeing is believing, or believing is seeing. Which is it?
15
posted on
05/27/2005 7:02:45 AM PDT
by
peacebaby
(This is the way to peace: Overcome evil with good, falsehood with truth, and hatred with love.)
To: doug from upland
Great summary, Doug. How did the jury look during Rosen's cross-exam and the defense counsel's closing? Any smirks or shaking heads to be noticed? In any event, we'll see--probably today before lunch. Thanks for all you do...
16
posted on
05/27/2005 7:37:27 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
To: doug from upland
You're not only thorough, you are entertaining! Go Doug go!
17
posted on
05/27/2005 7:39:19 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
To: eureka!
I saw no obvious expressions on jurors' faces.
Although at first I wanted to see Hillary's name involved in this, it was important to keep her out. That would have made it political and could have influenced jurors. The focus for the prosecution is on and had to be on Rosen.
18
posted on
05/27/2005 7:43:48 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: doug from upland
Thanks - much appreciated!
To: doug from upland
"I saw no obvious expressions on jurors' faces."That can be good. Based on the evidence I saw here, your anecdotal reports and human nature, methinks that the prosecution did a good job whereas the jury may have felt insulted by the defense. We'll see...
20
posted on
05/27/2005 7:48:14 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson