Skip to comments.
Wal Mart's Exploitive Practices Attacked By Website
Wake Up Wal-Mart ^
Posted on 05/26/2005 6:27:37 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
Because of Wal-Mart's inadequate wages and benefits, Wal-Mart employees are eligible for $2.5 billion in Federal assistance, which comes from your tax dollars.
(Excerpt) Read more at wakeupwalmart.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: dujerks; gowalmart; ihateamerika; marxistidiots; nutjobs; populistmorons; rejoiceinwalmart; socialistcons; wallyhaters; walmart; walmartsucks; youshoptheretoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,021-1,032 next last
To: A. Pole; Ramonan; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones
Companies like Wal-Mart give free enterprise and capitalism a bad name. Socialists should thank them for the free propoganda.
To: Clintonfatigued
All of this could be solved if we eliminated those federal assistance program.
Voila. Problem vanishes.
To: Clintonfatigued
Companies like Wal-Mart give free enterprise and capitalism a bad name.
Feel free not to work there or shop there. Otherwise, it's none of your business how they operate their business, as long as it's legal.
To: Clintonfatigued
That's BS put forth by retail unions. Fact is ... there are tow motor operators at WalMart distribution centers around the country that are millionaires ... thanks to WalMart stock option plans.
5
posted on
05/26/2005 6:31:55 PM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: Clintonfatigued
Wal-Mart, the Haliburton of retail.
6
posted on
05/26/2005 6:33:39 PM PDT
by
Ruddles
To: flashbunny
You're only partly right. In order for there to be support for ending such programs, work has to pay enough for the workers to subsist on their own.
To: Clintonfatigued
And unions solve problems for the workers how.
I know they give them some of the vig from loan sharks.
8
posted on
05/26/2005 6:34:33 PM PDT
by
dts32041
(Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
To: Clintonfatigued
Don't work at Walmart if you don't like the wages and benefits.
9
posted on
05/26/2005 6:36:01 PM PDT
by
NavVet
(“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
To: Clintonfatigued
Wait a minute, how did they conclude that Walmart's wages and benefits were "inadequate"?
To: Conservative til I die
Do you have similar ideas about other issues, like abortion?
To: Clintonfatigued
Because of Wal-Mart's inadequate wages and benefits, Wal-Mart employees are eligible for $2.5 billion in Federal assistance, which comes from your tax dollars. And if those jobs didn't exist, the cost would be even more.
12
posted on
05/26/2005 6:36:52 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Ruddles
13
posted on
05/26/2005 6:37:12 PM PDT
by
Ruddles
To: Clintonfatigued
No! No! You are supposed to attack Wal-Mart on the weekend!
14
posted on
05/26/2005 6:37:12 PM PDT
by
gogipper
To: Clintonfatigued
Obviously there is something wrong with the level at which Federal assistance programs are pegged...
To: Ruddles
Wal-Mart, the Haliburton of retail. Yes, both great companies.
16
posted on
05/26/2005 6:37:27 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Clintonfatigued
So, Wal-Mart is a good argument for socialism, huh? I don't think you and I are going to agree much on political or economic matters.
17
posted on
05/26/2005 6:37:42 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: flashbunny; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; ...
"Because of Wal-Mart's inadequate wages and benefits, Wal-Mart employees are eligible for $2.5 billion in Federal assistance, which comes from your tax dollars."
All of this could be solved if we eliminated those federal assistance program. Voila. Problem vanishes. Please elaborate. It is very interesting.
18
posted on
05/26/2005 6:39:02 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
(The Law of Comparative Advantage: "Americans should not have children and should not go to college")
To: Clintonfatigued
You know, thinking back, last time I went to Wal-Mart none of the employees had chains on their legs. They seemed to be free to roam at will. Those who have skills and initiative and don't want to work at Wal-mart will soon find a position that they do like, because they are not enchained there.
19
posted on
05/26/2005 6:39:21 PM PDT
by
gogipper
To: popdonnelly
Wait a minute, how did they conclude that Walmart's wages and benefits were "inadequate"? As if the local merchants with over-priced goods who would put things on order for you for 6 weeks provided their stock-boys with health insurance.
20
posted on
05/26/2005 6:39:26 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,021-1,032 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson