In other words: "The design of living things is evidence for a designer, whose existence is sufficient to conclude that living things are designed."
This conversation looks familiar. I'll bet you a beer it ends like this.
Courtesy ping only.
Hi Condorman. Yes. We went a few rounds on that one. It hasn't ended yet. This might be a good opportunity for you to clarify what evidence is necessary for you to conclude that an entity exists as a result of intelligent design. How do you know, when you see a "man-made" object, that it is man-made?
If you're gonna bet beers I hope they're ice cold.