Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv; Fester Chugabrew
Fester: So, when you see an automobile, you need to see the person who designed it in order to have suitable evidence it was designed?

In other words: "The design of living things is evidence for a designer, whose existence is sufficient to conclude that living things are designed."

This conversation looks familiar. I'll bet you a beer it ends like this.

1,338 posted on 05/27/2005 2:46:22 PM PDT by Condorman (Changes aren't permanent, but change is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1266 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

Courtesy ping only.


1,339 posted on 05/27/2005 2:47:09 PM PDT by Condorman (Changes aren't permanent, but change is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1338 | View Replies ]

To: Condorman
This conversation looks familiar.

Hi Condorman. Yes. We went a few rounds on that one. It hasn't ended yet. This might be a good opportunity for you to clarify what evidence is necessary for you to conclude that an entity exists as a result of intelligent design. How do you know, when you see a "man-made" object, that it is man-made?

If you're gonna bet beers I hope they're ice cold.

1,345 posted on 05/27/2005 3:04:05 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson