Posted on 05/24/2005 11:24:34 AM PDT by Borges
Borges wrote:
People need to learn to pick their battles. This one isn't worth fighting.
-- Don't forget: It's all for da children! /sarc
Professional busy-bodies.
There are mitigating facts though, like the following:
Executives point out that only four of the 31 Kids Meal toys are specific to Sith. The toys "clearly celebrate not just one film but the entire Star Wars saga," says Edna Johnson, a Burger King spokeswoman.
OK. I could accept that. But then,
But Rolfe says "the tie-in is very specific to this film." Wrappers around Kids Meal toys all promote Sith, he notes.
My girls love Star Wars, but I won't take them to see this episode. I will buy them these BK kids meals and then tell them that we're not going to see this Star Wars episode.
While we are on the subject. What is in the newest movie that calls for the PG13 rating? My son has seen the previous movies with us at home. He wants to see the new one. The rating has given me some concern. If the movie is the same as the others than I won't have a problem taking him. Is there something really bad added that got the 13 rating?
It does seem odd to make children's toys for a film they shouldn't be watching. That's until you realize the money to be made!
Exactly. I wonder if the freckled hand of Brent Bozell (professional blue-nosed busybody) is behind this?
This whole campaign is just Jar Jar Binks out for revenge on Lucas for not giving him a speaking part in the latest movie. He can't figure out why that little muppet Yoda gets all the jedi chicks.
A little more violent and darker than the previous two.
This wasn't an issue in the 70s when Wiener King offered "Last Tango in Paris" toys...
I have seen it. There is only one really questionable sequence, where there are repeated views of a badly burned Anakin. If your child understands that you will be covering their eyes in this scene, then there really is nothing wrong (IMO), with this film. Everything is inferred, then spoken about.
Several cuttings off of arms and heads (which other SW movies have also had); at one point an implied murder (without showing the actual deed) of children, and later a vague look at a child's corpse. Those were what seemed worst to me.
So what is the issue? The set also includes characters from the new movie? Get a fricking clue people.
A bunch of busy-bodies with way too much time on their hands. Who are they to determine what is appropriate for other peoples' children? Personally I think people like this should be made to clean portapottys with a teacup and a toothbrush for a year. Give them some true appreciation for what $hit really is.
Although I hated BK, I would always bug my ma into taking me there just for the Empire Strikes Back Trading Cards.
Also there is a woman who has a traumatic child birth.
I thought maybe it was rabid Jar Jar Binks fans upset over his shoddy treatment.
"This wasn't an issue in the 70s when Wiener King offered "Last Tango in Paris" toys...
Didn't Wiener King offer a "Boogie Nights" action figure back in the 90s?
Dirk Diggler! That's a great movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.