Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yehuda
So when you write it as a future possibility it's a viable construct, but when anyone else writes about it they are morons standing against the world.

In war timing is all important...and noone wins every battle. Sometimes you must retreat and fight again in more favorable circumstances. Sharon has proved himself over half a century as a great warrior and great leader in both war and peace. I trust his judgement. I wouldn't trust you to help me cross the street.

Yes, expulsion of Arabs is opposed but expulsion of Jews is supported. And because Pres. Bush and the rest of the world feel this way than it must be correct?

This is a complete misstatement of the President's position. But - in case you hadn't noticed - Bush is an American, not an Israeli, President. It's his job to promote American interests. The strategy he's decided upon is to take on Muslim countries one at a time, not all at once. Sharon has to adjust his strategy to ours because of the huge difference in strengths.

WHERE DO THE ARABS COME FROM THAT SIT ON JEWISH LAND?

For an answer to this read Jabotinsky. He understood, better than most and certainly better than you'll ever do, that homelands are obtained by conquest and held by force. European Jews, mostly eastern european, decided to take Palestine from the Muslims who had held it for more than a thousand years. They, in turn, had taken it by force from others, who had done the same for as far back as we can trace it.

17 posted on 05/24/2005 9:04:03 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson