Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Maybe we should calm down a bit and see what happens.

Owens, Brown, and Pryor will be confirmed this week.

Let's see what happens to the others.

Even if the nuclear option had been pulled, the other nominations wouldn't have been voted on for weeks.

Let's hold our fire here and not act like crazy liberals.

I think this deal is better than we initially thought.

1 posted on 05/23/2005 9:19:08 PM PDT by watsonfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: watsonfellow
no one anticipates that such a situation [extraordinary circumstances] will arise, assuming Democrats keep their promise.

ROTFALOL

28 posted on 05/23/2005 9:38:46 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
Thank goodness! We have a deal:


31 posted on 05/23/2005 9:40:56 PM PDT by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
I think this deal is better than we initially thought.

The point is that there DID NOT NEED TO BE A DEAL AT ALL!!
55 - 44 - 1.

35 posted on 05/23/2005 9:41:32 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
The problem with the 'pubbies'... it's simple: THEY'RE NOT STREET FIGHTERS (like the Dems).

Until the republicans are willing to go to the mat for principle (other than getting re-elected) then they can be rolled.

The irony of it is, they think that they're caving in is for the principle of getting em re-elected when all the while, it's probably the icing on the cake that will guarantee that they won't get re-elcted (e.g. Spectre, Graham, DeWine).

If only we could be as tough as the dems... sigh

37 posted on 05/23/2005 9:43:42 PM PDT by blue jeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

Sounds like a Republican behind scenes is trying to stem the fury building at this loss and unacceptable betrayal. We asked for an up or down vote on all nominees, was that too much to ask? NOOOOOOOOOOO!!

The RINO's can go to hell and forget spinning this as a conscientious victorious stand for principle! These people can forget trying to lie to us and suggest this was a victory. We HAD a victory and the RINO's gave it away. We spent years setting the stage for victory and the RINO's BETRAYED us to save the Democrats and assert a power coup for themselves.

Well, tell this anonymous source we are FURIOUS and will remain so. People will pay.


39 posted on 05/23/2005 9:44:49 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
"Let's hold our fire here and not act like crazy liberals. I think this deal is better than we initially thought"

It seems that the Dem's Jedi mind trick has worked on you too.

40 posted on 05/23/2005 9:47:55 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow; All
This sounds bad

HOW TRUE TO THEIR word Democrats will be may become apparent in about a month, when Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist is expected to announce his retirement. Already in Washington rumors are swirling that current Attorney General Alberto Gonzales may be under serious consideration for the empty slot left vacant after one of the sitting justices is elevated to fill Rehnquist's role.. "You look at what he hasn't done in his few months at Justice," says a former White House staffer, "and it makes you think he's really been looking ahead and trying to keep as clear from controversy as he can."

Gonzales has managed to sidestep taking a position on the Terri Schiavo legal battle, and beyond stating his basic support for the eight judicial nominees in limbo, he has avoided being embroiled in this current debate. As well, he has made very few public appearances where anything remotely controversial could have been uttered.

"Everything points to a Gonzales nomination," says a lobbyist aware of the White House thinking on prospective judicial nominees.

One school of thought related to the threat of a constitutional "nuclear" option was that it would ensure the Bush White House an easier time in putting forward a solid conservative as the president's first nomination to the Supreme Court. But Gonzales would be unacceptable to just about every conservative group in Washington and beyond.

"I don't know of any conservative who worked to reelect this president who would be satisfied with a Gonzales nomination," says a Senate Judiciary staffer. "This president was reelected because conservatives want to see a conservative on the Court. If the president has a second opportunity, then perhaps there is room for Gonzales. But only after the president fulfills his promise to voters."

Gonzales=Souter

41 posted on 05/23/2005 9:48:07 PM PDT by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

I DO NOT WANT GONZALES>NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO> he is anti-gun and not firm on being aganist abortion. NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. GWB must not make the mistake of his father.


44 posted on 05/23/2005 9:53:29 PM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
While Democrats were able to have their "exceptional circumstances" clause inserted in the deal, no one anticipates that such a situation will arise, assuming Democrats keep their promise.

Fools!

47 posted on 05/23/2005 9:57:33 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

All the other reports I have seen say that only 3, not 6 are guaranteed an up or down vote. I have to question the accuracy of this report.


48 posted on 05/23/2005 10:00:10 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

God told us not to put faith in men (not even in princes) because you'll be let down everytime. I don't remember the exact quote.

How true it is...


51 posted on 05/23/2005 10:01:40 PM PDT by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

When I see Chuckie Schumer smiling, It's never a good sign for Republicans.....


52 posted on 05/23/2005 10:02:45 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

This was one of those days where I just wanted to say home, watch foxnews, listen to limbaugh, and read freerepublic. I really must talk to boss about getting me internet access. I say we won. We got 7 of 8 nominees an up or down vote, future nominees will get the same, and nuclear option is still. I can't see how anyone on either side can say we loss.


55 posted on 05/23/2005 10:05:03 PM PDT by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (Those who will not fight for freedom deserve slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

You bet, and dog logs are a tasty treat.


56 posted on 05/23/2005 10:08:27 PM PDT by Treader (Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow

Tihs is what the Reps will get from me.

N(ot)A(nother) D(IME).

Dear GOP, go FUCH yourselves.


57 posted on 05/23/2005 10:09:11 PM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
"Everything points to a Gonzales nomination," says a lobbyist aware of the White House thinking on prospective judicial nominees.

If Gonzalez is nominated, the dems will breathe a sigh of relief and confirm him quickly. He will be part of the center, maybe center-left coalition on the Court. Since he would replace Rehnquist, a conservative, he will represent a lurch to the left on the Court. This conservative hasn't fought for years for a Republican Senate and President just to move the Court to the left.

59 posted on 05/23/2005 10:12:26 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
"Everything points to a Gonzales nomination," says a lobbyist aware of the White House thinking on prospective judicial nominees.

Oh, no. Please, please no.

60 posted on 05/23/2005 10:12:56 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
Uh huh, and the gang of fourteen also said they can and will work with other moderates such as Little Dong in North Korea and the Mullahs in Iran.

\ Sarcasm on for foreseeable future.
62 posted on 05/23/2005 10:15:51 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
"I don't know of any conservative who worked to reelect this president who would be satisfied with a Gonzales nomination," says a Senate Judiciary staffer. "This president was reelected because conservatives want to see a conservative on the Court. If the president has a second opportunity, then perhaps there is room for Gonzales. But only after the president fulfills his promise to voters."

Self imposed affirmative action. How nice.

68 posted on 05/23/2005 11:18:22 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: watsonfellow
NO......here's the deal!!!!

NOT ONE PENNY!!!

I'm angry enough to pledge money to real conservatives who will run against these RINO's and replace them. How about $100.00 a head?

I encourage everyone to attack!


69 posted on 05/23/2005 11:20:28 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson