Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators Avert Showdown Over Filibusters
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/23/05 | David Espo - AP

Posted on 05/23/2005 6:49:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - In a dramatic reach across party lines, Senate centrists sealed a compromise Monday night to clear the way for confirmation of many of President Bush's stalled judicial nominees, leave others in limbo and preserve venerable filibuster rules.

"In a Senate that has become increasingly partisan and polarized, the bipartisan center held," said Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record), D-Conn., one of 14 senators _seven from each party — to pledge their "mutual trust and confidence" on the deal.

"The Senate is back in business," exulted Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., reflecting the view that a showdown would have would have had a long-term detrimental impact on Congress' ability to conduct the nation's business.

Under the terms, Democrats agreed to allow final confirmation votes for Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown and William Pryor, named to appeals court seats. There is "no commitment to vote for or against" the filibuster against two other conservatives named to the appeals court, Henry Saad and William Myers.

The agreement said future judicial nominees should "only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances," with each Democratic senator holding the discretion to decide when those conditions had been met.

"In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement," Republicans said they would oppose any attempt to make changes in the application of filibuster rules.

While the agreement was signed by only 14 senators, they held the balance of power in a sharply divided Senate.

And Republicans said they would seek to confirm Owen as early as Tuesday, with other cleared nominees to follow quickly.

Even so, Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., noted he had not been a party to the deal, which fell short of his stated goal of winning yes-or-no votes on each of Bush's nominees. "It has some good news and it has some disappointing news and it will require careful monitoring," he said.

Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada seemed more receptive — although he hastened to say he remains opposed to some of the nominees who will now likely take seats on federal appeals courts.

"Checks and balances have been protected. The integrity of the Supreme Court has been protected from the undue influence of the vocal, radical right wing," Reid said.

The White House said the agreement was a positive development.

"Many of these nominees have waited for quite some time to have an up-or-down vote and now they are going to get one. That's progress," presidential press secretary Scott McClellan said. "We will continue working to push for up or down votes for all the nominees."

The deal was sealed around the table in Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record)'s office, across the street from the Capitol where senators had expected an all-night session of speech-making, prelude to Tuesday's anticipated showdown.

Nominally, the issue at hand was Bush's selection of Owen, a member of the Texas Supreme Court, to a seat on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

In fact, as the rhetoric suggested, the stakes were far broader, with Republicans maneuvering to strip Democrats of their right to filibuster and thus block current and future nominees to the appeals court and Supreme Court.

There currently is no vacancy on the high court, although one or more is widely expected in Bush's term. Chief Justice William Rehnquist's coincidental presence in the Capitol during the day was a reminder of that. At age 80 and battling thyroid cancer, he entered the building in a wheelchair on his way to the doctor's office.

Under a complicated situation in effect on the Senate floor, an agreement among six senators of each party was sufficient to avert the showdown. Six Democrats agreeing not to filibuster assured judicial nominees of a yes-or-no vote. Six Republicans signing the accord meant Frist and other GOP leaders would not have the votes to strip Democrats of their ability to filibuster.

The agreement came as Frist, R-Tenn. and Reid, D-Nev. steered the Senate toward a showdown on Bush's nominees and historic filibuster rules, under which a minority can prevent action unless the majority gains 60 votes.

For decades, Senate rules have permitted opponents to block votes on judicial nominees by mounting a filibuster, a parliamentary device that can be stopped only by a 60-vote majority.

But Republicans, frustrated by Democratic filibusters that thwarted 10 of Bush's first-term appeals court nominees and prepared to block seven of them again, threatened to supersede that rule by simple majority vote.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; avert; filibuster; filibusters; senators; showdown; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Hank Rearden
Lindsey Graham, I suppose, assumes that the Senate being "back in business" is a cause for rejoicing.

And in his world it is. It certainly is a relief for the chattering classes in Washington and the assorted leeches that feed off the government. The gravy train will keep on rolling, and the pork, privilege and largesse will not be interrupted by a nasty battle over morality and truth.

These fights over principles are so messy, don't you know. They really distract us from the "real" business of government.

41 posted on 05/23/2005 9:09:01 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy

You stated it as a Fact rather than just another hysterical opinion.

The Net Result of this is three of the most conservative judges will now be confirmed and nothing else has changed. Frist hasn't made any deals. Getting the next set will be easier and quicker.

A proper headline would be "Democrats Blink, Allow Vote on Conservative Nominees" but that one isn't as hysteria-generating.


42 posted on 05/23/2005 9:35:08 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Senators Avert Showdown Over Filibusters

Nonsense, the Senators have done what Senators do best, push their problems ahead of them.

43 posted on 05/24/2005 5:15:54 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
A proper headline would be "Democrats Blink, Allow Vote on Conservative Nominees" but that one isn't as hysteria-generating.

I prefer what Senator Grassley called it: "Unilateral Disarmament."

44 posted on 05/24/2005 6:31:32 AM PDT by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy

You prefer to see the negative while ignoring the fact that now the damn has broken and the confirmations are going to start rolling in.


45 posted on 05/24/2005 2:01:40 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
...confirmations are going to start rolling in

Until they stop ... abruptly. Time will tell.

46 posted on 05/24/2005 7:22:45 PM PDT by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy

There will be no stop. The RATS have cut the ground out from under their reason for opposition by allowing these hideously "radical" judges to be confirmed. I understand rationality has little to do with them or their braindead followers but the great majority which pays little attention to this will not swallow their nonsense anymore now that we can cut their MSM shills off at the knees and expose their lies.


47 posted on 05/25/2005 12:17:42 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson