Posted on 05/23/2005 5:23:07 PM PDT by kristinn
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS
We respect the diligent, conscientious efforts, to date, rendered to the Senate by Majority Leader Frist and Democratic Leader Reid. This memorandum confirms an understanding among the signatories, based upon mutual trust and confidence, related to pending and future judicial nominations in the 109th Congress.
This memorandum is in two parts. Part I relates to the currently pending judicial nominees; Part II relates to subsequent individual nominations to be made by the President and to be acted upon by the Senate’s Judiciary Committee.
We have agreed to the following:
Part I: Commitments on Pending Judicial Nominations
A. Votes for Certain Nominees. We will vote to invoke cloture on the following judicial nominees: Janice Rogers Brown (D.C. Circuit), William Pryor (11th Circuit), and Priscilla Owen (5th Circuit).
B. Status of Other Nominees. Signatories make no commitment to vote for or against cloture on the following judicial nominees: William Myers (9th Circuit) and Henry Saad (6th Circuit).
Part II: Commitments for Future Nominations
A. Future Nominations. Signatories will exercise their responsibilities under the Advice and Consent Clause of the United States Constitution in good faith. Nominees should only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances, and each signatory must use his or her own discretion and judgment in determining whether such circumstances exist.
B. Rules Changes. In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement, we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress, which we understand to be any amendment to or interpretation of the Rules of the Senate that would force a vote on a judicial nomination by means other than unanimous consent or Rule XXII.
We believe that, under Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the word “Advice” speaks to consultation between the Senate and the President with regard to the use of the President’s power to make nominations. We encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate, both Democratic and Republican, prior to submitting a judicial nomination to the Senate for consideration.
Such a return to the early practices of our government may well serve to reduce the rancor that unfortunately accompanies the advice and consent process in the Senate.
We firmly believe this agreement is consistent with the traditions of the United States Senate that we as Senators seek to uphold.
It's not over until it's over.
Sean Hannity said today that we really need to watch Senator John Warner (VA) 202-224-2023, or use toll-free number in my tagline for Senator Warner and all senators.
57% of Americans in Rasmussen poll say that "Senate rules should be changed so that a vote must be taken on every person the President nominates to become a judge." That's unchanged from two weeks ago.
Maybe we ought to tell our U.S. senators about this poll, and also tell those "swing" senators.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2005/Judicial%20Nominations--May%2014.htm
Rush Limbaugh said that senators are wavering back and forth, partly because of pressure from the public. Let's get more phone calls and/or e-mails than the other side does.
Even if none of these WAVERING senators is your own senator,
please call 'em, anyway.
The last I heard the undecided GOP Senators are Collins (ME), DeWine (OH), and Warner (VA). Frist can afford to lose only two, because McCain, Chafee, and Snowe have declined to end the judicial filibusters.
We can call toll-free at 877-762-8762 .
E-mail info can be found here (but phone calls are more effective):
http://www.conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm
Urge each to FULLY SUPPORT THE FILIBUSTERING
RULES CHANGE and NO COMPROMISES.
And your point is?
Reid won and the republicans lost. How could it not be clearer. During this congress we will be fighting over supreme court nominees with 40 democrats holding total veto power. If you can't see that now, you will before the end of the year. Those seven rinos sold out the supreme court and turned it over to the ACLU.
Sure does look that way. But I suppose we won't know for certain until the first Supreme Court vacancy.
A. Future Nominations. Signatories will exercise their responsibilities under the Advice and Consent Clause of the United States Constitution in good faith. Nominees should only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances, and each signatory must use his or her own discretion and judgment in determining whether such circumstances exist.
B. Rules Changes. In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement, we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress, which we understand to be any amendment to or interpretation of the Rules of the Senate that would force a vote on a judicial nomination by means other than unanimous consent or Rule XXII.
The RINOS explicitly relinquished the constitutional option for the remainder of the 109th Congress. The 'Rats reserved the right to filibuster in 'extraordinary circumstances' (without definition.)
Hypothetical A good conservative is nominated to the bench. The Dems slime and then filibuster the candidate. The agreement is null and void.
A ruling from the chair is NOT a rule change but a rule clarification.
McCain will be Hillary's VP.
Yeah, the Dems didn't get anything out of this, and we lose nothing by not initiating the nuclear option AGES ago. Suuuure.
That's because of ONE person. CARL LENIN. Why? Since Spence retaliated against one of Don "Keating 5" Riegle's blue slips on the first president by taking out a blue slip on Carl Lenin's cousin-in-law Helene White.
Don't blame me. I voted for Rocky.
My word to Warner and Frist: you and other Republicans were put into power in order to overturn 40 years of mindless, ineffective, anti-religious democrat rule. You have failed. Don't count on us again.
Reread the agreement. The 7 Democrats are allowed to decided for themselves whether the candidate is acceptable. The agreement recommends that the President take their advice before nominating a judge. The 7 RINO traitors are committed to work against changing any rule in the 109th Congress. Hopefully they will not be in the 110th Congress.
Qualifications for Republican Senator ... must be good at tent folding.!
Dark Side election getting set up for 2008
The Princess of Darkness, hiLIARry
and
John McEgo (architect of that excellent ... for democrats ... campaign finance reform)
in which McCain will lose ... come general election time the media will turn on him and he will be savaged will Keating Five Ads and Stories.
On his own standing with Republicans, McCain says, "I am the most sought-after of all Republicans ... Particularly since the 2004 campaign, there has been a great softening of this dislike for me." McCain aides are even discussing the possibility of Karl Rove supporting his candidacy. McCain 2000 supporter and GOP lobbyist Ken Duberstein adds, "John has continued to be one of Bush's strongest supporters. I think he's been quite careful. He's making all the right moves."
Let me just say "Not a snowball's chance in Hell!
Frist did not have the votes weeks ago. Just how many of these RINOs do you think would have vote with the Republican party???? I'm not sure he ever had the votes.
Only after he loses the Republican nomination, which he will.
Warner's mailbox is full at 9:37 PM on 23 May 2005. I'll bet none of those voice mails are complimentary!
I will drill them tomorrow!
First, Bob, I appreciate your willingness to dialogue with me about this--you still haven't called me a name.
Second, as to your quote above: the indisputable fact that some Freepers are rude doesn't mean you should emulate them (I can hear our mothers now: "If your friends jumped off a bridge....").
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.