Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham; Alberta's Child; warsaw44
So the deal is signing an agreement pledging “mutual trust and confidence.” God Almighty!

This is from Drudge:

The agreement said future nominees to the appeals court and Supreme Court should "only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances," with each Democrat senator holding the discretion to decide when those conditions had been met.

"In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement," Republicans said they would oppose any attempt to make changes in the application of filibuster rules.

So we're back where we were before.

1,540 posted on 05/23/2005 6:55:53 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies ]


To: Victoria Delsoul
This troubles me...I've been reading FR over the last few months and it appears there is a lot of anger at the Republicans.

Between the issue of illegals and our party not having the guts to pull the nuclear trigger I fear a serious backlash.

Third party type backlash. The type which guarantees a split in party votes and a Dem Victory in '08.
1,643 posted on 05/23/2005 7:16:46 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul
So we're back where we were before.

Exactly. I'm not sure where this is all headed, but I'd be curious to see how it plays out when a judicial nomination is deemed "extraordinary" by a Democrat on that committee.

1,896 posted on 05/23/2005 8:35:31 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson