Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

Why don't you wait to make a judgement until the first filibuster happens on a Bush nominee? Three anathemas to the civilized world have just been accepted by the Demoncrats.


1,450 posted on 05/23/2005 6:39:09 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1431 | View Replies ]


To: All
Most of us are angry at the compromise and we all have hoped that the Senate would have voted to end the filibuster once and for all. However the 3 judges out of five that were approved for an up and down votes were the most brutalized by the left, Prior, Owens, and Rogers Brown, much more than the other two who we do not their fate Saad and Meyers. Most of us do not even know much about these two judges and they were never in the middle of the liberal attack machine. Moreover this will make it hard for the Democrats to filibuster other judges because in their mind these 3 judges approved in this compromise deal were the worst of the worst according to them. These 3 judges were very high standards for the “extreme circumstances”, and I do not know how the Democrats can consider other future nominees as more extreme judges. Moreover President Bush can appoint these three judges to the US SUPREME COURT if there are three vacancies and the Democrats cannot do anything about it.

PS: When the up and down vote on the 3 judges will be in the coming weeks, the vast majority of us who are raising hell on this thread, will be very happy.

1,571 posted on 05/23/2005 7:00:35 PM PDT by alwaysrepublican (When Passion Rules she never rules wisely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson