Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sisters give birth at 12, 14, 16
BBC ^ | 05/23/2005 | BBC

Posted on 05/23/2005 12:04:01 PM PDT by Truthsayer20

Sisters give birth at 12, 14, 16

Three schoolgirl sisters have given birth aged 12, 14 and 16.

The Williams sisters, who live with their mother in a council house in Derby, feature in a BBC3 documentary called Desperate Midwives.

Natasha, the oldest, Jade and Jemma, the youngest, are reported to receive £600 a week in benefits.

Their mother Julie Atkins, 38, who said the girls were too young and had ruined their lives, blamed schools for providing poor quality sex education.

Mother defiant

Jemma was first to give birth, to T-Jay in February last year, and weeks later Jade and Natasha discovered they were pregnant.

Natasha had daughter Amani in November and Jade followed with Lita in December. The younger sisters are still at school.

Mrs Atkins told the Sunday Mercury: "I don't care what people say about me. I blame the schools - sex education for young girls should be better."

The sisters feature in the BBC3 series Desperate Midwives: The real truth about childbirth, starting from 9pm on Monday.

Episode seven follows a midwife from the Derby City hospital as she helps the family prepare for the third child.

No going back

Mrs Atkins told the Sun that she still found it difficult to believe what had happened.

"They are still little girls and now they have babies of their own," she said. "But I don't care what people say, I love my kids and I'm here to help them.

"If I could turn back the clock, I would prefer them not to have children. Their education is so important."

Two of the girls are no longer in contact with their children's fathers.

Jemma is quoted in the Sun as saying: "I only told my boyfriend David, who was 14 at the time, but I didn't want to have an abortion.

"He was my first love but now I'm gutted because he doesn't want to have anything to do with me or T-Jay."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: educationnews; momsboyfriend; sluts; students; teenpregnancy; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-149 next last
To: blueblazes
Where's the father of these little whores anyway?

One is a 38 year-old Asian man who lives with his parents.

61 posted on 05/23/2005 12:51:27 PM PDT by Drew68 (IYAOYAS! Semper Gumby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba; Conservative4Ever

"3 teenage pregnancies - 0 abortions."

You must have missed my post. The eldest girl has already had an abortion and two miscarriages. Not one to learn from her mistakes, evidently.

"£600 a week in benefits and can't purchase birth control?"

Birth control is free if you're on benefits anyway. Just gets better don't it?


62 posted on 05/23/2005 12:52:00 PM PDT by Glyndwr4Cymru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Xenophon450

In that part of town the usual family consisted of a mother, a passel of kids with a passel of different sperm donors and a pimp. To them, being a kid is what you do until you start turning tricks or selling crack...and most of the crack dealers had elementary age kids as their runners.


63 posted on 05/23/2005 12:52:16 PM PDT by Bombardier (Scratch a Democrat, find a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
Somewhere I read that the UK has a big problem with very young girls having babies.

Natasha, the oldest, Jade and Jemma, the youngest, are reported to receive £600 a week in benefits - so why not? They'll never have to work a day in their lives.
It happens here in America all the time. That's what our tax dollars buy for us, too.

64 posted on 05/23/2005 12:52:17 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Truthsayer20
Their mother Julie Atkins, 38, who said the girls were too young and had ruined their lives, blamed schools for providing poor quality sex education.

It's not the school's job mum. You screwed up. Big time.

65 posted on 05/23/2005 12:52:45 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If you only knew the powerrrrr of the Tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsayer20
Their mother Julie Atkins... blamed schools for providing poor quality sex education.

I'd say that they passed with flying colors.

66 posted on 05/23/2005 12:53:33 PM PDT by Redcloak (Over 16,000 served.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

The only sensible thing to do is deny them all government assistance. NOT A DAMN DIME. They either raise the children by themselves with their parents assistance or give the kids up for adoption or an orphanage. If we continue to assist these horrid little monsters in spawning the future criminals of the world, there will be no end to it. Stop rewarding the behavior and the behavior will stop. It's the only way.


67 posted on 05/23/2005 12:54:52 PM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

or dumbest. Some things you just can't make up.


68 posted on 05/23/2005 12:55:01 PM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Well, at least they're not racist, eh?


69 posted on 05/23/2005 12:56:00 PM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Truthsayer20
"Their mother Julie Atkins, 38, who said the girls were too young and had ruined their lives, blamed schools for providing poor quality sex education."

Of course mom has no role whatsoever in the slutitizing of her children.

70 posted on 05/23/2005 12:56:19 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Wouldn't surprise me if none of 'em ever saw the inside of a church, either.


71 posted on 05/23/2005 12:56:24 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

We all know that they will be lauded as heros by the Liberal press for being "Strong women" in the face of their barbaric husbands. If they had any fibre of strength they would have said no.


72 posted on 05/23/2005 12:56:29 PM PDT by Xenophon450
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
If it's ever outlawed in this country, expect LOTS of similar stories to pop up.

Abortion is very, very, very widely available in the UK, so your comment is totally off the mark.

These girls are getting pregnant because they want to have babies because they want the checks in the mail every week. Pay a teenage girl with no morals $12,000+ a year to get knocked up, and what do you suppose happens?

73 posted on 05/23/2005 12:57:14 PM PDT by Campion (Truth is not determined by a majority vote -- Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
Hi All-

The kids have nice, tanned complexions compared to their mothers' pasty skin.

~ Blue Jays ~

74 posted on 05/23/2005 12:57:25 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays

At least one does. No shock there.


75 posted on 05/23/2005 12:59:19 PM PDT by Bombardier (Scratch a Democrat, find a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The babies are cute and healthy-looking.

I'm glad that they have a chance at life, and that they weren't aborted.


76 posted on 05/23/2005 12:59:26 PM PDT by Palladin (No Korans were abused in the making of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

I appreciate your patience of me. My concerns are what happens to these babies years from now? If the mother and daughters were not responsible enough to prevent the many pregnancies, who's to think they'll care enough to put the babies up for adoption, the greatest effort.

The lesser efforts are to teach them and care for them, which isn't 'likely. These babies are going to grow up neglected, possibly abused, terrified of life, poverty, lack of education.

Surely sometimes no life is better than being locked in a closet, fed table scraps, made to lie in their own excrement, thrown out in the streets, begging, prostitution, incarceration, thievery, drug addiction, alcoholism, starvation, sleeping on bug invested, fetid mattresses, under boxes, foraging for food in dumpsters,....

Somewhere right now a child is hurting, crying, scared. It breaks my heart.


77 posted on 05/23/2005 1:00:00 PM PDT by peacebaby (I am a marvelous housekeeper. Every time I leave a man, I keep his house. Zsa Zsa Gabor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Wait, I just caught that! A grand A WEEK?? The UK pays young slutlets FIFTY-TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS A YEAR to get knocked up??


78 posted on 05/23/2005 1:01:09 PM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Truthsayer20

Good Grief! ......Charlie Brown


79 posted on 05/23/2005 1:01:36 PM PDT by oceanperch ( Monday May 23, 2005 King Vanity Celebrates #26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

At least the Sun somewhat tells its readers who's paying for them...


80 posted on 05/23/2005 1:02:23 PM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson