Posted on 05/23/2005 7:40:59 AM PDT by worldclass
Christians don't riot over derogatory references to Christ and other provocations by incontinent "artists." Jews take it in their stride when they're described as "a virus resembling AIDS," which is what Sheikh Ibrahim Mudeiris said a week ago in his sermon on Palestinian state TV, funded by the European Union. Muslims can dish it out big-time, so why can't they take it, even the teensy-weensiest bit?
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
That about says it for me.
Well said! LOL
All from single terrorist parent households.
Could it be that deep down they realize that Muhammad's role as savior of mankind is bogus?
Why can't they take it? Well I'll tell you why- because we suck up to them big time. Look at all the apologies rolling out already. When we placate these devils, we reap what we sow.
The old saying goes- Spare the rod, spoil the child.
Dhimmitude is real. Let's fight it.
What came to mind was that these people need very little to "start a riot", and the reason is that they are uneducated. Women obviously will be decades behind in establishing themselves in Muslim society, and the uneducated masses use a magazine article as a reason " to kill each other" However, what would they do if you built them some schools? Blow them up of course.
It's pretty simple:
Hold a BOOK with unwashed hands = Rioting.
Slice someone's head off = Crickets.
I really wonder if there was true freedom of religion and thought in the Arab/Muslim world.....how many would remain Muslim. Fear and ignorance is par for the course in this part of the world.
"Watching the media circle the wagons around the beleaguered Mr. Isikoff this week, Martin Peretz of the New Republic described them as "a profession that is complacent, self-righteous, and hopelessly in love with itself." "
How true!
(I had no idea the part that Imran Khan played in this.)
ROTFL!
I loved the AlGore envir-friendly toilet comment. That would have taken at least 950 flushes to get that book down.
In October 2001, Faizal Aqtub Siddiqi, president-general of the International Muslims Organization, warned that the bombing of Afghanistan would create 1,000 bin Ladens. In April 2003, Egypt's President Mubarak warned the bombing of Iraq would create 100 bin Ladens.
So right there you had a 90 percent reduction in the bin Laden creation program — just by bombing a second country.
LOL.
I fully support our troops adding bacon bits to each filthy muslim corpse.
so why can't they take it, even the teensy-weensiest bit?
Because deep down they know that while their religion doesn't bring them any closer to God, it has kept them slaves for centuries and that is a bitter pill to swallow.
And in Western, civillized scoiety, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. In this case, they resell it as oil.
"Women obviously will be decades behind in establishing themselves in Muslim society..."
Women civilize men. These women are powerless, so their men remain uncivilized.
"However, what would they do if you built them some schools? Blow them up of course."
We ARE building schools for them. When you hear of them blowing them all up, let us know. (I expect a terrorist elements might do so, but not the majority of people)
Good thought, Keats. And true, too.
History's biggest inferiority complex?
That whole honor/guilt tribal thing?
If you are still dealing with "Klans and Tribes" there seems to be little hope for any advancement. Stoneage society mentality??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.