Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters to decide on historic cross
WND ^ | May 21, 2005 | By James Lambert

Posted on 05/21/2005 9:58:14 PM PDT by BigFinn

The San Diego City Council voted this week to allow voters to decide the fate of the historic Mt. Soledad Cross overlooking the Pacific Ocean in La Jolla.

The vote represented the newest chapter in a long line of legal battles to remove the cross, led by ACLU attorney James McElroy, who represents an atheist seeking to remove the Christian symbol from public lands.

The legal battles date back to 1989.

Essentially, the voters will decide whether they want to transfer the property to the National Park System as a war memorial.

For more than 50 years, the site has been recognized by the public as a place where war veterans are honored for their service to the United States.

The Mt. Soledad Association manages the site where plaques recognize war veterans who served in the last century. Most of the veterans recognized are from the greater San Diego area.

Last November, two Republican congressmen from San Diego County, Rep. Duncan Hunter and Rep. Randy Cunningham, added a provision to an appropriations bill to allow the city to designate the site as a national war memorial.

If the citizens of San Diego agree with this proposal, the site will be maintained by the National Park System. The bill was signed into law by President Bush in December.

Representatives from the Mt. Soledad Association and the park system were in Washington last week to discuss a working plan to manage the site.

Opponents of the transfer, including the ACLU, contend it is illegal and unconstitutional. However, a lawyer for the Thomas More Center, Charles LiMandri, contends there is legal precedent for protecting religious symbols that already are on federal land.

While the debate on religious symbols on public land slowly is working its way through the courts, the proposition to transfer city property to the federal government will be decided by San Diego voters July 26.

San Diego Mayor Dick Murphy, who is leaving office in July, says "it may provoke additional litigation, but some things are worth fighting for."

Murphy was a supporter of a referendum that forced the city council to revisit the issue. The referendum sparked a record 89,000 petitions to request that the cross not be dismantled from its present site.

The initiative rescinded an earlier vote by the council that would have removed it.

The referendum, put together in just a month, was widely supported by San Diego radio talk-show hosts Roger Hedgecock, Rick Roberts and Mark Larson and Los Angeles host Paul McGuire.

Slightly more than 33,000 verified signatures were required for the referendum to be successful, based on a registered voter base of approximately 650,000 voters.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: aclu; cary; churchandstate; cross; mountsoledad; sandiego
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last
Let me get this straight. The people sign petitions to get it on the ballad. They vote that the cross will remain in place. The judges revoke the intiative saying it is unconstitutional.
1 posted on 05/21/2005 9:58:15 PM PDT by BigFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: everyone

"Voters to decide ..."

Ha, ha. Very funny. If only it were true.


3 posted on 05/21/2005 10:27:17 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

What is it about this that you don't get? The ACLU controls our courts. End of story!


4 posted on 05/21/2005 10:28:32 PM PDT by de Buillion (Jerusalem, 1099)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason

The cross has been there for decades. It is part of the community. People have grown up with it. The fact that this means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to the Anti-Christian Liberal Un-Americans is revolting.


5 posted on 05/21/2005 10:28:50 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason
"Our Founding Fathers seem to have intentionally avoided any mention of "god" in our constitution and wrote a specific ban on government establishment of religion. "

Please tell me Sir/M'am, where this "specific ban" appears? Where is it written"?

6 posted on 05/21/2005 10:33:23 PM PDT by de Buillion (Jerusalem, 1099)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason

It's been there for 50 years. You're not an american so I guess you just don't get it. Would you support pulling up all those crosses that stand at the graves of brave Americans who saved your country from totalitarianism? I would think that they are on public land. That attitude is why europe, unfortunately, is soon to be in the dustbin of history.


9 posted on 05/21/2005 10:41:52 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason

Where is this case did Congress make a law?


11 posted on 05/21/2005 10:43:58 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason

I hate to point out the glaringly obvious, but the city of San Diego is named for a Christian saint. Should the city change its name as well as lose the cross?


12 posted on 05/21/2005 10:46:09 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("I never got a job from a poor man." - Larry Gatlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason

You asked why people feel compelled to put these things on public land. I pointed out that this happened a long time ago. If people are trying to put things on public land NOW, it's because they're striking out at the Anti-Christ Lawyers Union any way they can.

Having a cross on public land isn't in any way a violation of the constitution.


15 posted on 05/21/2005 10:52:22 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason
By and large the crosses in question were placed on public land long before anyone ever imagined it would ever be an issue. It wasn't that long ago that expressions of faith were not only acceptable, but welcome. We never have had or will have a federal church. Nobody is suggesting that the First Baptist Church (or any other) on 1st and Kitchewa Street in Anytown USA be declared our federally established church. Early in our history several states had established churches, but that went away. Don't ever forget that the same provision in the Bill of Rights also bans government from prohibiting the free expression of religion. No caveats as to time, manner, or place.
16 posted on 05/21/2005 10:52:52 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Pray daily for our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason

I already read your profile. You live in europe and you obviously reason like an appeasing european. Thus you will be treated like one. In the country in which you reside do you advocate pulling up all the crosses from the American cemeteries on public land? I guess so. Please stay in eurabia. We have far too many of your kind here as it is.


18 posted on 05/21/2005 10:55:59 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson