[Houmatt]

Question: What do we know about this memo?

[Doctor Raoul]

I miss the good old days, back when if Lucy Rameriz embarassed CBS News bigtime, Mike Wallace would have kicked down her door by now.

This is Rathergate Part II.

FAIR isn't FAIR, it's propoganda. Not even well thought out propoganda, but "bumper sticker" propoganda.

[TheGeezer]

I think this is the memo related to Tony Blair's government - and I am SO fuzzy on this - allegedly produced by a member of his government who later committed suicide - it was later discredited as revealing not that intelligence was manipulated, but that it was simply badly done. Or something like that.

Disregarded then as booshwah, finally, IMHO it was resurrected two days before the election in Great Britain by the London Times in an election-influence effort. That's why it has not caught fire and resulted in the resignation of George Bush, the elevation of John Kerry to the presidency by popular acclamation contrary to the constitution, and mass execution of all conservative Americans by liberofascists and radical Islamists.

[processing please hold]

Do you really believe that if this were actually true, the media would let it go. Hell, we had rathergate, the newsweak article and any other piece of lying crap they can throw at Bush to try and bring him down. They have to lie to try and hurt him, if they really had something, it would be splashed on every tv channel and newspaper coast to coast, 24/7.

[facedown]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...............

[Nick Danger]

What do we know about this memo?

The memo documents a discussion within Blair's cabinet concerning how they are going to respond to British domestic political issues surrounding the war in Iraq. They know they will have to go the UN route (to satisfy British public opinion), while the NSC in the US thinks it's a waste of time (which it was).

What the lefties think are 'smoking guns' are interpretations of events as seen by the Brits. For example, the lefties think this is a Smoking Gun:

Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.

Note that the last sentence is a conclusion drawn by Mystery Figure "C" who is reporting on his trip to Washington. C is not claiming that "they told me they are fitting the facts and the intelligence around the policy." Yet this is the conclusion the lefties have jumped to, and now they would like the Press-Democrat to broadcast their interpretation of the memo as if it were fact.

The danger, of course, is that the Press-Democrat will do just that.

[Tunehead54]

If they were really "FAIR" they'd link to the memo itself to let us decide for ourselves and they'd need to detail how they're certain it didn't come from CBS.

---

[gogipper]

"the public generally seems indifferent to the issue or unwilling to rehash the bitter prewar debate over the reasons for the war."

If I recall correctly, both the UK government and the US Senate conducted official investigations of this topic last year
http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/wm534.cfm.

In both cases the allegations that the national executives had manipulated intelligence were disproved. I believe that the British investigation was pretty pointed against the source, perhaps someone can fill in the details.

Here is a summary of the US version:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is worth reading all 511 pages of the Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq—both for what is said and what is left unsaid. Both have a lot to tell us about how to make America safer. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report makes the case for responsible intelligence reform and offers no evidence that political influence was brought to bear in shaping analysis to support particular policies. On the other hand, the report largely ignores the strategic challenges presented by the Iraqi regime and does not consider how the Select Intelligence Committee fulfilled its own oversight responsibilities in the months preceding the war in Iraq.

[wildbill]

I'm concerned about the "former senior American official" who called it "an absolutely accurate description of what transpired" (Knight Ridder, 5/6/05).

This description is usually shorthand for "Secretary of State." Was this Powell or merely an opinion of Madeline?

[Chode]

in the words of george galloway... "They are just words on a piece of paper written by who knows who..."

[weegee]

FAIR is unfair. AIM is better.

[keilimon]

One thing we do know is how to use a dictionary. The Primary meaning of the word fixed (according to Merriam-Webster) is - 1 a : to make firm, stable, or stationary b : to give a permanent or final form to.... The third definition is - 3 a : to set or place definitely : ESTABLISH b : to make an accurate determination of... The FINAL definition offered is the one the conspiracy nuts on the left prefer - 7 a : to get even with b : to influence the actions, outcome, or effect of by improper or illegal methods .... It seems to me the memo merely states that the justification for action was being prepared, not that it was being doctored in any way. Another example of filtering news (and words) through preconceived ideas. Probably the reason this hasn't been pushed by the press - they use words for a living, and maybe even own a dictionary or two.