To: jec41
I do not hear this outcry from any other Conservatives and if that were their thoughts they would surly be expressed. If you don't hear the outcry, then you aren't listening. It's not expressed in a surly manner, but I would characterize it as "alarmed" yet usually polite. Disenchanted doesn't equal surly!
416 posted on
05/23/2005 4:22:26 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Pretend you don't know me...I'm in the WPPFF.)
To: jec41
I re-read your post and see now that "surly" was likely a typo for "surely"...but my comments still stand.
417 posted on
05/23/2005 4:24:12 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Pretend you don't know me...I'm in the WPPFF.)
To: Gondring
You are correct. Surly was a typo. Spelling has always been a problem for me. I learned to spell (or not spell) at a time when my school system could not decide if to teach by memorization or phonics. I was taught memorization my first two years, phonics the next two and then we were switched back to the memory system in the fifth and sixth grades. It has remained a weakness I have yet to correct, however I made sure that my children learned by phonics and both are very proficient. I brought a hooked on phonics set not long ago with the intent of correcting that flaw and it is on my calender. That said I will use a tactic of MSM to defend my typo. Surely in no way relates to surly but attempts to impeach presidents (many in my lifetime) when given voice have always resulted in discourse. Therefore, on might surmise that any sizable movement of impeachment will surely end up surly.
Thanks for your observation and don't take me too seriously because I often argue both side of a issue in order to arrive at a logical position. Just having fun trying to keep up!!!
420 posted on
05/23/2005 6:37:26 AM PDT by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson