Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Librarian's brush with FBI shapes her view of the USA Patriot Act
USAToday ^ | Wed May 18, 6:25 AM ET | By Joan Airoldi

Posted on 05/18/2005 8:06:25 AM PDT by Redcitizen

Edited on 05/18/2005 8:17:50 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20050518/cm_usatoday/librariansbrushwithfbishapesherviewoftheusapatriotact

Gannett allows headline and URL only.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ala; fbi; investigation; jihadinamerica; leftistfifthcolumn; liberalpig; libraries; library; news; patriotact; police; policestate; privacy; rights; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: Redcitizen
Librarian's brush with FBI shapes her view of the USA Patriot Act

Does anyone believe this for one second? This librarian had NO OPINION about the Patriot Act until they were given this simple request?

21 posted on 05/18/2005 8:18:22 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Newsweek Lied! People Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
No surprise that this story emanates from Washington State.

It's not just Washington state. In TX, the librarians call our house when my books come in but won't tell Mr. M which ones. They won't even let him check them out for me even when I've taken time out to call and ask that he be allowed to. Interesting, they allow our kids (whom they know) to run in with my card and check them out.

22 posted on 05/18/2005 8:19:17 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

"I hope this self-righteous, sanctimonius freak show of a librarian feels better about herself when some towelhead blows up the space needle. Can there be any clearer evidence that liberals are anti-American?"

If they want the evidence they need to go through the correct legel channels. The idea of "secret courts" in America should start ringing a few bells for those who love this country. I'm all for either deporting of jailing terrorists but let's not sink to the level of some third world dictatorship to do it.


23 posted on 05/18/2005 8:19:44 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

The Soviets collected all kinds of "information" on much that went on in Nazi Germany and then in Western Europen. This information is still sitting in boxes, unread, in the former KGB stockrooms. Maybe this leftists would like to sift through some the these "recordings" from 1945!

There are not enough people in the employ of the FBI to cover the recordings of high-priority targets, like Zarqawi and his ilk, for them to start worrying about what some perve is reading in a Library in Schmuckville, USA! These people need to breathe some 02.


24 posted on 05/18/2005 8:19:45 AM PDT by NCCarrs (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/30/quake.usa.editorial.reut/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen
Fortunately for our patrons, we were able to mount a successful challenge to what seems to have been a fishing expedition. If it had returned with an order from a secret court under the Patriot Act, the FBI might now know which residents in our part of Washington State had simply tried to learn more about bin Laden.

With a Patriot Act order in hand, I would have been forbidden to disclose even the fact that I had received it and would not have been able to tell this story.

Hmm... Given that the FBI withdrew the subpeona so quickly, I wonder if they then went through the Secret Court and that this disavowal is the librarian's way of signaling that.

25 posted on 05/18/2005 8:20:12 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

yes I was speaking in the narrative sense, this man carries out horrid attacks (THEN) our government talks about him continuously and engages in a nearly 4-year hunt for him, etc.

Your point on the inactivity of his agents is noted. He must have greatly under-estimated the severity of US response.


26 posted on 05/18/2005 8:20:57 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen
Would USA Today ever run a story headlined:

Citizen's Brush With Illegal Aliens Shapes Her View Of Border Security

27 posted on 05/18/2005 8:21:05 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Newsweek Lied! People Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: coconutt2000

What if the person who wrote in the margin didn't check the book out? Not all people are clever, but that would be the smartest thing to do if one simply had to write in the book.


29 posted on 05/18/2005 8:23:39 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NCCarrs
We told the FBI that it would have to follow legal channels before our board of trustees would address releasing the names of the borrowers. We also informed the FBI that, through a Google search, our attorney had discovered that the words in the margin were almost identical to a statement by bin Laden in a 1998 interview.

Undeterred, the FBI served a subpoena on the library a week later demanding a list of everyone who had borrowed the book since November 2001.


They did go through the proper legal channels. At this point, the board of trustees should have turned over the information. Instead, they library (no doubt with the help of the ACLU) told the FBI to go jump in a lake.
30 posted on 05/18/2005 8:24:46 AM PDT by Old_Mil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
Does anyone believe this for one second? This librarian had NO OPINION about the Patriot Act until they were given this simple request?

Exactly. She has been waiting to stick her finger in the eye of Homeland Security, FBI, or what-have-you....I am siding with the Feds on this one because this lady is only doing this because she hates America first and last.

31 posted on 05/18/2005 8:24:54 AM PDT by yellowdoghunter (Liberals should be seen and not heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen; All

Perhaps everyone who thinks there's no problem with the request can write down everything they read till they die, and send the list to the Government every month.


32 posted on 05/18/2005 8:26:19 AM PDT by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Question Liberal Authority
Would USA Today ever run a story headlined: Citizen's Brush With Illegal Aliens Shapes Her View Of Border Security?

The government's utter disinterest in securing the border (to the point of condemning citizens who try to do the job for them) shapes my view of all the other stuff they do under color of "security".

34 posted on 05/18/2005 8:28:43 AM PDT by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GianniV
Mr. Bookman

"I know your kind, Seinfeld. You celebrities think the rules don't apply to you. Well, I've got news for you, buddy, they do." Or something like that . . . I heard that Seinfeld could barely keep a straight face during Bookman's Joe Friday rants, and that they had to redo a lot of scenes. The Bookman character was so good they wanted to bring him back, but could never come up with another plausible story line for the character.
35 posted on 05/18/2005 8:28:54 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Well, I'll get flamed for this I'm sure. But I spent most of my adult life defending the rights of the Citizens of this country to be free to do as they wish.

It's not the Governments business what I or anyone else reads.

It's only the Government's business what they DO with what they read.

Yeah it sucks, but those who would give up a little freedom to achieve the slightest bit of safety deserve NEITHER.


36 posted on 05/18/2005 8:30:02 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Well said.


37 posted on 05/18/2005 8:30:15 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Then the fishing expedition will catch no fish.

But just assuming that the person with the pen didn't check out the book, doesn't mean one shouldn't check it out to make sure.

There is no FBI list here. Only a library's list of people who checked out a particular book that happened to have something written in the margins. Something highly suspect of having been written by a terrorist. For all we know, it was someone who was writing a class assignment on OBL who jotted down the quote in the margins so it would be easy to reference.

So long as the FBI attempts to have probably cause for asking for privileged information I won't be worried. It is when they stop caring for such niceties that we should worry. So, I agree that the librarian had every right to challenge the request, but to deny it after being presented with what appears to me to be a reasonable example of probable cause, I think the librarian was just a foolish political hack.


38 posted on 05/18/2005 8:30:50 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I think Bookman was Jim Carrey's boss in 'Bruce Almight.' Every time I see his mug, I just yell out, "It's Bookman!"


39 posted on 05/18/2005 8:31:39 AM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

YOU might be able to live with it, but I WOULDN'T be able to live with it.

I'm not of the "I'm not doing anything wrong, so I have nothing to worry about," crap. The Patriot Act violates the Constitution -- and the government looking at what people read encroaches on freedom.

What can you say, though -- some people like to be ruled with an authoritarian fist, in the name of faux security.


40 posted on 05/18/2005 8:32:14 AM PDT by MsJefferson (Self-evident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson