[Neocon Shavuz]

Pat Buchanan's views on Jews in any possible aspect of either History, Politics, Religion etc. can not be regarded as an objective ones. He is "tough on Jews" to put it nicely.

If you are more interested in the facts rather then in emotional antisemitic squeal, read that

http://www.jcrelations.net/en/?id=970
It's Preliminary Report of International Catholic-Jewish Historical Commission on Holocaust.

[TomB]

If you are more interested in the facts rather then in emotional antisemitic squeal, read that

Very few people around here have been tougher on Pat than I have in the past, but there is NOTHING in this article that can even remotely be term "antisemitic".

Throwing that term out on this thread greatly weakens any argument you may have. To wit, I noticed you failed to address any issue presented.

[wideawake]

I disagree strongly with Buchanan on Israel and many other things.

But this disgusting slander of the saintly Pius XII has got to stop.

He did more to fight the Holocaust than any other European leader except maybe Churchill.

[Alberta's Child]

Pat Buchanan's views on Jews in any possible aspect of either History, Politics, Religion etc. can not be regarded as an objective ones.

In your smug, self-absorbed arrogance, you seem to overlooked the fact that this article isn't about "the Jews" at its core -- it's about Pope Pius XII.

[ArrogantBustard]

I defy you to identify even ONE line from this article which is even remotely "antisemitic".

Adopting a vaguely Jewish sounding screename does not entitle you to commit slander.

[CouncilofTrent]

Funny how it wasn't "anti-semetic squeal". Just because Buchanan denounces anti-Catholic individuals who slander the name of a great man doesn't mean he is anti-semetic. Anyway, he states facts. You actually have to read half of the article to have that point come across, I guess....