Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHARLITE
Had Newsweek known that someone besides US soldiers would die because of this they would not have published it.
4 posted on 05/17/2005 4:19:39 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (What's the difference between Joseph Goebbels and Michael Moore? About 150 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CrazyIvan
Had Newsweek known that someone besides US soldiers would die because of this they would not have published it.

Don't bet on it.

6 posted on 05/17/2005 4:22:30 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CrazyIvan

Hogwash. They have been trying to keep the Middle East unstable for years now.

They are the peanut gallery razzing the adults. They offer no solutions and they know that they will not be held accountable.

During WWII such lies (as with those Kerry told Congress) would be classified as treason designed to rile up the enemy.

Lord Haw Haw and Axis Sally were convicted of treason after WWII. The British got to William Joyce first so he was tried and executed, there are some who feel he would have just been jailed if he could have returned to the US.


7 posted on 05/17/2005 4:23:35 PM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CrazyIvan


It does NOT MATTER whether these lies WERE written in "good faith" or EVEN IF THEY WERE NOT LIES. This story should NEVER, EVER have been written in the main stream press, EVEN IF TRUE!!!

This information OUGHT to have been brought to the attention of the US gov't, and let them handle it QUIETLY. Inflammatory information like this must be dealt with RESPONSIBLY - in that case (as in Abu Garib) the US must discover the facts, punish perpetrators if any, deal with systemic problems if they exist, and only after that is done, (usually) release the embargo on the story to that reporter or organization who brought it to light.

It was prima facie clear that this, like the overblown Abu story (that the military was already investigating and in the process of punishing), had great potential to harm the United States and our allies (Iraq, Afghanistan, and others); to kill people and injure others - and it is certainly clear that our civilian leadership would condemn such activities if they were occuring. The proper course for responsible news organizations is to let them know behind closed doors what might be going and to allow them time to clean it up. In extreme cases, the story ought to be embargoed forever, but typically it should be released after a period of time.

A RESPONSIBLE news organization might even state a "story" was shopped to them that was found to be UNTRUE after investigation by proper authority - Newsweek COULD have done that in this particular case, and done a great service to our country and the world in exposing how misinformation can attempt to be planted in the media. They blew it, and instead CAUSED MURDERS and Mayhem.

This "shopped" story brings more than shame to Newsweek, though - people are DEAD who ought not be dead.

It is time to bring back wartime censorship of the press.

`\


17 posted on 05/17/2005 4:35:34 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson