Your turn to play doctor? Here's the real scoop, the stroke was caused by the aortic dissection only. There was no stress she was resting comfortably in La Grange until Mullinax seized his opportunity for face time and started dragging Mae around the South.You probably missed this.
I thought you were contending that she was "terminal?" That she was, in essence, dead already?
So you feel that people with 6 mos. or less are dead already. Fine. Don't pin that on me. I think she had more quality time left.
She was starved, dehydrated and drugged with morphine for ten days...
Mullinax says so? Give me a source other than one that uses him solely. The judge has already called his accusations false.
So which is it?
You also have a comprehension problem, I see. What part of IF don't you understand. You claim the granddaughter accelerated Mae's death by caring for her in the way she did. I say Mullinax's actions were more dangerous to Mae. IF anybody killed her it was Mullinax.
What part of MAY don't you understand?
So you feel that people with 6 mos. or less are dead already. Fine. Don't pin that on me. I think she had more quality time left.
Yes, that comes through so clearly in your posts.
How alive is she? Mullinax knew, just like everybody else should have, that Mae was diagnosed terminal (less than 6 mos. to live). Post #56
The judge has already called his accusations false.
Give me a source other than one that uses him solely. In his letter to TerrisBlogSpot Judge Boyd uses the phrase "half-truths" but he never specifies what are half-truths, what are complete falshoods or anything else specifically. By saying "half-truths" he seems to contradict his own assertion (and your position) that all of Ken's "accusations" are false.
You still seem to be divided as to whether Mae died of a stroke due to her aortic dissection or Ken Mullinax killed her.
I've asked you a bucket load of direct questions that you have chosen to side-step. Go find yourself an ounce of sincerity and then get back to me. Until then.