[cooper72]

The real problem is that they may or may not have the proof. I'd think that if these allegations are true, then there must be some evidence of it other than some Iraqi official's testimony.

They don't have any proof. That is why Galloway is there, and why no-one produced any. If they had proof they would show it.

[Brilliant]

Yeah, I think you're right. It's pretty amazing to me that they'd make the allegation, though, without some pretty good evidence. Apparently the evidence they've got was the statement of some Iraqi officials who were involved. But there's gotta be a paper trail of some kind.

Getting a London or Swiss bank to produce it though might be difficult.

[snugs]

That is my fear and as a Brit I totally loath Galloway but I have to hand it to him if one knew nothing about what was going on here and you were hearing this for the first time you would certainly be questioning the allegations against him.

[cyncooper]

They don't have any proof. That is why Galloway is there, and why no-one produced any

And you say you watched?

If they had proof they would show it.

Clearly you're settling for parroting George Galloway's lines (and lies).