Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Now Tell Me Again Who Is Affiliated With NewsWeek Magazine?

Posted on 05/16/2005 5:10:40 PM PDT by onyx eyes

NBC and MSNBC that's who. And tonight, my jaw dropped open (again...) watching ol Chris matthews try to explain this one away. This one, which is going to take more American lives.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: affiliated; agitprop; lordhawhaw; magazine; newsweek; propaganda; whois
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: randog
This story has become a major outrage not only because people rioted and died but because the new media,us, talk radio a few t.v. nets is not kicking the sh!!t out of the old media. Talk radio ,Laura, Sean were all over this today and you see the result. We will rule the day it may just take a while. New media will Trump old media
21 posted on 05/16/2005 5:44:38 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes

I'm expecting a major media effort to assert that the story is really true, even though it's been retracted.


22 posted on 05/16/2005 5:45:29 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Please publish the list here and please ping me when you finish the list.


23 posted on 05/16/2005 5:45:49 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

remove the "not" in my last post.


24 posted on 05/16/2005 5:46:39 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes
I think crying fire in a crowded theater is about the same as this MSM slimy fake report.
25 posted on 05/16/2005 5:48:24 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

After all, the White House did get OBL to make that video right before the election, so of course they got Isikoff to make this false charge.


26 posted on 05/16/2005 5:51:30 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Don't forget this trick that BS-NBC/Newsspeak played on the American people.

Have they done this with ANY other poll results?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4205947

Follow the "Editor's Note: This week, the online version of the Newsweek poll received an unusually high rate of response, with the clear majority of participants casting uniform votes. For these reasons, we believe the poll is being intentionally manipulated. In addition, we received an e-mail alert suggesting that the campaign is being coordinated by at least one special-interest group." link:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-campaign2002/1074654/posts


27 posted on 05/16/2005 5:53:48 PM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Treason is a crime. Let them swing like Lord Haw Haw.


28 posted on 05/16/2005 5:54:57 PM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes
Un-F'ing believable to watch the MSM try and spin this - (just as they did the FAKE CBS memo's).

It is mind boggling.....but the fact is we are winning....more and more American's are starting to see completely through the MSM (and the MSM continues to whistle by the grave yard and act like it isn't happening....but it is!!).

29 posted on 05/16/2005 6:01:49 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Robin Wright of NYT

Unless she's moved in the last week or so, Robin Wright is with the Washington Post - the owners of Newsweek. She came to the WAPO from the LA Slimes in the past year. She fits right in with the WAPO bunch - Dana Priest, Dana Milbank, Ceci Connelly, etc., etc.. Liberal pukes all.

30 posted on 05/16/2005 6:06:35 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Exactly. As Cronkite revealed that Rove set up Bin Laden.


31 posted on 05/16/2005 6:28:47 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
New media will Trump old media

Because truth trumps fiction.

32 posted on 05/16/2005 6:41:27 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes

Maybe someone here can enlighten me. It appears obvious that whether or not Newsweek's folks got the story RIGHT (viz., one or more interrogator "dissing" the Koran), Newsweek--once allied or American deaths were linked to that line in the story--would have little choice about whether or not to retract. No retraction, more deaths (not that a simple retraction is going to halt the violence on the same issue, but NW could conveniently wash its hands after the retraction). And tho it's clear that some "journalists" don't mind bloody hands, allowing the violence to continue or spread based on their "report" would, one would think, expose them to enormous pressure from readers and other publishers.

For argument's sake, tho, suppose the allegation was false. Why did DOD fail to notice the line and challenge Newsweek IMMEDIATELY through other channels instead of waiting for the deaths to mount?

Is it possible that no one (DOD, various media, including NW) here believed that the mere mention of "desecration" of a book could cause such havoc? And having learned that it DID, why were "we" unanimous in blaming NW rather than the rioters?


33 posted on 05/16/2005 6:46:43 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

That is what Hardball was all about tonight---trying to insinuate that there really was a story---even though there wasn't---

Chris is looking like Dan Rather still saying that those documents, though fakes, are real....??????


34 posted on 05/16/2005 6:49:14 PM PDT by Txsleuth ( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jackbill

Sorry---I misremembered what paper she wrote for---but she is still a shill for the libs....


35 posted on 05/16/2005 6:51:02 PM PDT by Txsleuth ( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: randog
The Pentagon official that looked over the story didn't deny anything, but more importantly he didn't confirm anything.

If the Pentagon spokesman had any comment like, "That's a damn lie," or "Your source is full of (bleep)," then Newsweak would have cried censorship or strongarming by the Pentagon.

In any event, I'm not surprised that many left/libs are blaming it on the Bush administration somehow.

36 posted on 05/16/2005 7:04:14 PM PDT by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes

NBC Nightly News spun this as the fault of the Pentagon, for not originally telling Islamikoff that the story was false.


37 posted on 05/16/2005 7:12:53 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
I'm expecting a major media effort to assert that the story is really true, even though it's been retracted.

Or maybe they'll say something like, "Though we do not have indisputable evidence to prove this particular instance - it could be true."

38 posted on 05/16/2005 7:14:03 PM PDT by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Excellent. Truth is and always should be the bottom line.
I wrote for an MSM paper for 12 years. At the time they were just beginning the shift from straight journalism of covering a story and presenting what actually happened instead of re-inveintg it. Today I am ashamed to have ever written for them.
39 posted on 05/16/2005 7:16:07 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: onyx eyes

Seems to me that the father of the editor of Newsweek ran for president on either the Socialist or the Communist ticket.

I'll have to look back through some old notes to confirm that...


40 posted on 05/16/2005 8:21:41 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson