[A CA Guy]

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/9/24/92001.shtml

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/6847469.htm

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20030925-115143-8944r.htm

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0926/p01s03-uspo.html

http://faculty.smu.edu/jkobylka/newsItems/Recall%20in%20California%20Is%20Put%20Back%20on%20Schedule.htm

Tom McClintock can only get the other Democrat elected if he is ever the nominated candidate for a high office like Governor as Republican.

I wish him all of the success in the world for office of dog catcher, but he's burned too many bridges to ever be a uniting force for the Republicans in California.

[calcowgirl]

Ping to #84

[Carry_Okie]

Your first reference is according to Issa:

That was the bombshell revelation yesterday from the driving force behind the recall movement, Rep. Darryl Issa, who described to nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity a conversation he had with the conservative favorite several months ago.

Your second reference requires registration. Why don't you quote it this third party who witnessed this "promise"?

Your third reference is according to Issa:

"Tom made a promise to me that he, in fact, wouldn't be a spoiler," Mr. Issa said. "So the pressure is on Tom to decide whether that has become the reality, that he might be becoming a spoiler."

Your fourth reference doesn't say ANYTHING about a promise.

Your final reference is according to Issa:

Mr. Issa said he would decide in the next few days who he believed should get out of the race. But he said that Mr. McClintock had promised him at the start of the recall contest that he would not carve up the Republican vote and be a spoiler.

So far, all you've managed to "prove" is that you DON'T know for a fact that Tom McClintock made that promise; all you know is that Issa said he did.

You have failed.