Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy
The goal would be to find an electable but more conservative candidate for after Arnold. Arnold was only a beginning in turning this around more toward conservatism.

Name some names that you, in your infinite wisdom, find to be more conservative than Arnold, yet squishy enough for your assumed swing voters. And explain why a centrist swing democrat would prefer them to the similarly squishy Dem candidate that would oppose him/her.

Personally, I would have liked to see Condi give elected office a try in CA. She would certainly have been an improvement over Boxer as a Senator. But then, so would my cat.

216 posted on 05/17/2005 5:25:42 PM PDT by LexBaird ("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats" --Jubal Harshaw (RA Heinlein))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

I think there are lots of more conservative people than Arnold.
The big question would be, which could be electable having some cross over vote?
We know it will never be McClintock as a choice, but they should get cracking on the future. I do see Arnold as only the first steps in the right direction, he sure won't be able to do it all by any stretch of the imagination.

McClintock is dead in the water, but the great question would be "Who is the Republican party developing as talent for the future of this state? Maybe RonDog or others have specifics on that.


221 posted on 05/17/2005 5:30:20 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: LexBaird

>>But then, so would my cat.

ROFL! :-)


232 posted on 05/17/2005 5:50:11 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson