Skip to comments.
Indictments Mount for Hillary Aides
NewsMax ^
| 5/15/05
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 05/15/2005 2:13:51 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Though press coverage of the trial of Sen. Clinton's finance director, David Rosen, was sparse last week, the case has brought attention to the prosecutions of at least three more Clinton fundraisers. The press is pretending it's not even happening.
1
posted on
05/15/2005 2:13:52 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
when are people finally going to get it ?
Laws, rules, morals, ethics, etc. are for OTHER people and NOT the royal clintoons
2
posted on
05/15/2005 2:16:21 PM PDT
by
kingattax
To: wagglebee
Well, according to the judge and DA in the case in California, Hillary has absolutely NO connection to this!!!
But, her HUSBAND, may be called as a witness---
What a complete farce this is----
3
posted on
05/15/2005 2:18:01 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
To: wagglebee
One way for the whole mess to go away is to do the usual clintoon thing; permanently eliminate all that's involved.
4
posted on
05/15/2005 2:27:09 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: wagglebee
Does it bother anybody(MSM) that the woman who wasn't aware, and doesn't know what's going on in her inner circle, is being touted for president?
5
posted on
05/15/2005 2:34:50 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
( Social Security...neither social nor secure.)
To: wagglebee
A few will be martyred. Nothing of importance will come of this. Every 4 to 8 years, the good cop/bad cop scenario changes. nothingnew here.
FMCDH(BITS)
6
posted on
05/15/2005 2:35:54 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: Txsleuth
"But, her HUSBAND, may be called as a witness---
What a complete farce this is----"
Her husband is still working on the meaning of "is"...
7
posted on
05/15/2005 2:40:21 PM PDT
by
RavenATB
("Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." George Bernard Shaw)
To: wagglebee
I wonder if some of these "Aides' realize their predecessors had a habit of disappearing ?
8
posted on
05/15/2005 2:41:01 PM PDT
by
26lemoncharlie
('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
To: 26lemoncharlie
I wonder if some of these "Aides' realize their predecessors had a habit of disappearing ? The lucky ones get prison cells, the others get taken on a ride to Fort Marcy Park or something similar.
9
posted on
05/15/2005 2:44:17 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Txsleuth
Well, according to the judge and DA in the case in California, Hillary has absolutely NO connection to this!!! Umm, that's because the person on trial there is David Rosen. Would you expect the prosecutor in United States v Rosen to open his case by telling the jury that somebody else did it? What the judge said is that "Mrs. Clinton will not be called to testify in the case." That would be because neither the prosecutor nor the defense counsel plans to call her. It is not because the judge has an opinion on whether there might someday be a case called United States v Clinton. I wish people would stop acting as if they think Hillary Clinton is supposed to be found guilty in David Rosen's trial. That only happens on TV. In the real world, the only person who can be found guilty in David Rosen's trial is David Rosen. Please await the start of Paul v Clintons, coming soon to a different Los Angeles courtroom, where Hillary Clinton (and Bill too) will be "Defendant." |
10
posted on
05/15/2005 2:47:09 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(Honey, Intel wants to go outside)
To: wagglebee
"People are known by the company they keep"
11
posted on
05/15/2005 2:52:14 PM PDT
by
jws3sticks
(Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
To: wagglebee
Some get both, like Jim McDougal.
12
posted on
05/15/2005 2:59:47 PM PDT
by
expatpat
To: wagglebee
Didn't one of them commit suicide by beheading himself?!!
13
posted on
05/15/2005 3:01:05 PM PDT
by
26lemoncharlie
('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
To: Nick Danger; doug from upland
I am sorry---I was led to believe that the judge said more than just that she wouldn't be called to testify--or maybe I read what DFU has been posting and Hannity has been saying.
Do you know why Bill Clinton could be called as a witness?
14
posted on
05/15/2005 3:09:13 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
( Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
To: Nick Danger
"where Hillary Clinton (and Bill too) will be "Defendant.""
Maybe. Mr. and Mrs. Harry Houdini Clinton haven't had to answere for a thing in their whole lives. It's true there is a first for everything. But I doubt this is it. Civil suits are easily settled or dismissed.
15
posted on
05/15/2005 3:11:23 PM PDT
by
tjg
To: wagglebee
Has the press asked "What did the Senator know and when did she know it?"
Seems a fair question given the history.
16
posted on
05/15/2005 3:11:27 PM PDT
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(San Francisco - See It Before God Smites It.)
To: Nick Danger
"where Hillary Clinton (and Bill too) will be "Defendant.""
Maybe. Mr. and Mrs. Harry Houdini Clinton haven't had to answere for a thing in their whole lives. It's true there is a first for everything. But I doubt this is it. Civil suits are easily settled or dismissed.
17
posted on
05/15/2005 3:12:06 PM PDT
by
tjg
To: Txsleuth
No, Hillary will not testity in the Rosen case. The prosecution doesn't need her. Why Bill would be called to testify, I'm not sure. Character witness? But why would anyone rely on a known perjurer to be your characte witness?
Bill was at the event, after all. He might know something of value other than breast size of the female guests.
18
posted on
05/15/2005 3:24:12 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: wagglebee
And where does the rotten trail lead, I wonder?
19
posted on
05/15/2005 3:52:18 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
To: wagglebee
Dean screams that DeLay should be in jail?
20
posted on
05/15/2005 4:18:40 PM PDT
by
BIGZ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson