[Txsleuth]

Well, according to the judge and DA in the case in California, Hillary has absolutely NO connection to this!!!

But, her HUSBAND, may be called as a witness---

What a complete farce this is----

[RavenATB]

"But, her HUSBAND, may be called as a witness---

What a complete farce this is----"

Her husband is still working on the meaning of "is"...

[Nick Danger]

Well, according to the judge and DA in the case in California, Hillary has absolutely NO connection to this!!!

Umm, that's because the person on trial there is David Rosen.

Would you expect the prosecutor in United States v Rosen to open his case by telling the jury that somebody else did it?

What the judge said is that "Mrs. Clinton will not be called to testify in the case." That would be because neither the prosecutor nor the defense counsel plans to call her. It is not because the judge has an opinion on whether there might someday be a case called United States v Clinton.

I wish people would stop acting as if they think Hillary Clinton is supposed to be found guilty in David Rosen's trial. That only happens on TV. In the real world, the only person who can be found guilty in David Rosen's trial is David Rosen.

Please await the start of Paul v Clintons, coming soon to a different Los Angeles courtroom, where Hillary Clinton (and Bill too) will be "Defendant."

[PistolPaknMama]

Well, according to the judge and DA in the case in California, Hillary has absolutely NO connection to this

Sure, whatever. These people worked for Hitlery, a known control freak, and she is not connected to it. I bet she was as shocked by these discoveries as she was about her husband's sex scandals.