Posted on 05/15/2005 7:30:54 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
"After the CFR bullcrap...McLame should just STFU"
Bump.
I was wondering when someone was going to compare Mccain with Fox. I was thinking how these Open Borders Loons all speak the same language.
I want to know how much money Mccain gets from Soros and Rockefeller.
You only need so many folks to drive Budweiser trucks.
I wonder what Mccain's stance on Illegal Chinese immigrants is, since they dont really fit in Arizona, but will flood from the Canuckistan border.
Remember the corruption and conspiracy of the Keating 7?
McCain was right in the middle of that. But a smart politician can almost always cover his tracks, even with grand jurys and special prosecuters.
At least the local TV stations are giving him some airtime to put it to Mccain and Kolbe. Last go around all they did was slam him with ad-hominem attacks. Thank goodness for the Minutemen.
I think this is the same Mccain-Kennedy bill he is discussing, that is being debated in congress as we speak.
This amnesty effort of McCain is with Ted Kennedy. NEVER forget who the rino's are. They deceive us and sell us out.
"...because they are accustomed to a lower standard of living."
Not to mention that they live three families in one house!
It's not just Mccain/Kennedy it's Soros too.
http://www.sorosmonitor.com/absolutenm/templates/news.aspx?articleid=12&zoneid=1
It's a sanity mechanism in my brain. It blocks me from thinking about him, or I'll go mad.
Anyway, you're right of course. I guess having Slimy Eddie around in the past didn't bug me so much since he was outnumbered so badly. With Grijalva there...it's different.
A lot of my family falls into that category. Which stuns me. For the life of me, I can't figure out why they vote for the SOB. They say, well, he's been there a long time, he must be doing something right. Huh?!
That's the "logic" of it from otherwise right wing people. The guy is there on inertia alone.
I gave Randy about $500 last time around. Guess I'll just have to double it, make sure he dumps the queer this time.
It's called following the money. Commoners (citizens) have little influence on legislation unless they can band together and.....gasp...raise money. Politicians always have their hands out when money is available for political favor. But it is who has the most money that wins every time.
How is a poor illegal alien going to come up with $2,000 to pay the fine? This sounds ridiculous, most illegal aliens who sneak into this country seem to have just the clothes they are wearing. What can McCain be thinking, that every illegal alien/guestworker has an extra $2,000. Or is the plan that the taxpayers subsidize the $2,000 per illegal?
I used to think McCain was remarkable to have survived POW in Vietnam, but lately he seems to have deviated from my prior conception of him.
If they are allowing people to buy off citizenship; $2,000 is not enough. For Legal immigrants the fees the INS charge is close to $1,500 over 5 years.
I would say $5-15k is more appropriate. How do they pay back the public debt they have rung up?
Report: Illegal entrants cost state $1.3 billion a year
http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/relatedarticles/24834.php
$1.3 Billion/425K = $5000. That's for one year in Arizona.
McCain is an IDIOT, but we all know that already.
Also the Mexican illegals are paying smugglers/traffickers between $1500-$3000 just to cross the border. If Mccain can allow them to come, they need to pay their way.
We do not need more indentured servants and low wage slaves; even if Soros and crew want them.
They seem to have dropped the idea that workers could return to their home country and still collect earned social security. I like the idea of people going home, though I think the idea of deporting 10 million people is ludicrous. Any tightening of the rules and enforcement will encourage some to leave voluntarily. Can we presume that applicants with criminal records will be deported? And how do we insure that deportation orders are not ignored? Still lots of quetions.
For example, RINO senators.
8 USC Sec. 1325
Any alien who -
1. enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact,
shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned not more than two years or both.
(b) Improper time or place, civil penalties - Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers
shall be subject to a civil penalty of -
(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or
(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection. Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed. (d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud - Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.
Section 1324a states: "Any person who knowingly hires/harbors/transports any illegal alien is guilty of a felony punishable by 10 years jail + $2000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of the vehicle or property used to commit the crime".
Section 1324c states, "All officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws shall have authority to make arrests for a violation of any provision of this section" (affirmed US v Perez-Gonzalez 2002 Fed App 0360, 6th Circ.).
Section 1644, same title states, "No local ordinance, rule, or measure shall stop law enforcement officers from enforcement of this section" (affirmed Southern District Court of NY, US v Rudy Guiliani,1996).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.