Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: how an abortion puts the next baby at risk
news.telegraph ^ | 15/05/2005 | Michael Day

Posted on 05/14/2005 5:25:00 PM PDT by Asphalt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: RonF
Correlation is not causation, folks. Careful how you read this.

The finding makes perfect sense when you understand what has to be done to perform an abortion. In order to abort a baby, the cervix must be opened, because that powerful muscle is what is holding the baby inside. During the birth process the cervix is dilated (opened)slowly and naturally because of the hormones released by the baby signalling the time for its birth. In an abortion, these hormones are not present, so the cervix has to be forced open.

The forced opening of the cervix causes that muscle to lose some of its strength. It is then less effective in holding a subsequent baby in the womb as it grows and exerts more pressure on the cervix. Because of this, babies are born prematurely because their mothers cannot hold them in the womb much past the beginning of the third trimester when the baby has grown much larger.

21 posted on 05/15/2005 12:45:51 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LauraJean

Very preceptive!


22 posted on 05/15/2005 10:26:46 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Thanx for the ping.


23 posted on 05/15/2005 10:28:02 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RonF; MHGinTN; Coleus; Mr. Silverback

I get the impression that any researcher who approaches this topic does so with the utmost care, in order to avoid the demonization of the pro-abortion crowd. This appears to be a very well designed and analysed study.


You can read the original article ($26 for 30 days' access) at

http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00478.x
The abstract is available online at


The risks were adjusted for age and other risk factors:
"a Adjusted for maternal age, parity, previous preterm births, marital status, educational level, employment during pregnancy, weight before pregnancy, smoking during pregnancy in a polytomous regression model."


Prior to adjustment, the risk was 1.9 for the very preterm births.


24 posted on 05/15/2005 5:14:29 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt
For those who want background to the APB (Abortion Preterm Birth) risk, a good (but it is TECHNICAL) review article published in 2003 can be found at: www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf If possible, inform medical professionals about this article. It has never, as of 17 May 2005, been challenged by a letter to the editor ( )
25 posted on 05/18/2005 2:22:01 PM PDT by TruthFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthFR

http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf


26 posted on 05/21/2005 4:55:00 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson