Rebuffing Bush, 132 Mayors Embrace Kyoto Rules

NYT ^ | May 14, 2005 | ELI SANDERS

[processing please hold]

Please accept my IOU.

I'll tuck it in my wallet for safe keeping. :-) It took me a long time to post pictures. Have you ever been to the 'sand box'? It's where I learned how.

[farmfriend]

Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

List of Ping lists

[jackbill]

Fortunately, the Mayors are about as powerful as eunuchs.

[processing please hold]

Try this. It should help.

link to sand box>

[Bullish]

IDIOTS!!!

Just like all liberals.

[okie01]

Though I do remain skeptical.

Are they not inferring 100% of Seattle City Light's power generation is hydro-electric + nuclear?

Somehow, I doubt it, too.

[Republican Wildcat]

If they want to destroy their economies, they can do so. They shouldn't be surprised when they get voted out of office later.

[mcg1969]

It could be biofuel based too, which is "net zero" greenhouse emissions.

[Just A Nobody]

Thanks for the sand box. I just moved and now have cable hook-up so I will start educating myself. I had dial up & half the time it would go in & out. When I get settled...

[processing please hold]

You're welcome. I have dial up too...(it sucks).

I still go there and piddle around..

[processing please hold]

Note to self: </i> is very important.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Those 132 Mayors, probably think the Kyoto accord is a new video game.

[Cincinna]

Someone should explain to these Mayors that a Treaty has to be ratified by the US Senate as set forth in the US Constitution, a document they have obviously lost touch with.

[Jonathan E]

Kyoto, isn't about pollution. It is about controlling
production and it is about taxing.
Kyoto would have given the UN the ability to restrict electrical output from electrical generators as well as restrict manufacturing, if either exceeded the allowable amount of gasses, it would be 'fined' read taxed, and that tax/fine would go to the UN, thus providing a source of income. Are these mayors looking for another source of funding without the treaty? And secondarily I thought only congress could ratify treaties, is this a way for states to adhere to treaties not ratified? To what end? For what purpose? Many are sheep others wolves in sheep clothing.

[leprechaun9]

The largest souce of "Global Warming" comes from the speeches in CONGRESS!