THE DESTRUCTION OF MARRIAGE PRECEDES THE DEATH OF A CULTURE

christianunderground ^ | Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

[ItsOurTimeNow]

*BTTT*

For the "it doesn't affect me, so why should I care?" crowd.

[Sirc_Valence]

Libs use social engineering all the time, so it has put a distaste in our mouths to even use the term. That's why only a few of us, for example Rush Limbaugh David Horowitz Dan Flynn, have excelled at it. This is all that leftist individuals and organizations do. The problem is that we just shake our heads, and pretty much take it for granted that they're gonna dismantle this nation. We'd prefer to improve ourselves, and help those near to us, that is how we keep busy.

Watch the documentary Brainwashing 101 which shows the way that the libs have used social engineering to lock out advances in political philosophy in academia, producing the education crisis that our country is in. You can Download it, but it on DVD, or watch it for free online via QuickTime, RealPlayer, or Windows Media by going to the link. Professor of Economics at Bucknell, Geoggrey Schneider, is on camera stating that "anything which is intimidating, which is going to poison the campus can't be allowed." He's a Marxist, so he's one example among many of the way that Universities are basically leftwing think tanks and political organizations. And the media plays dumb by "wondering" where the divide in this country comes from. The people that are in charge of America's most important institutions are the same ones that prolonged the life of the Soviet Union, who were mentored and educated by those that supported and designed the policies in support of Mao in the Chinese civil war against those who fled to Taiwan, forming the small outpost of freedom that is threatened today with invasion from the mainland. Ask yourselves, would conservatives call strikes on 400 colleges and universities around the nation when the U.S. military planned a major counterattack against its enemies? Would we burn books and take over clasrooms for "sit ins" and call for people to shoot their officers?

What distinguishes us from the libs is that we draw the line when it comes to government social engineering against its own citizens. As economics R.M. Hartwell has observed: "What schools and universities propagate in formal education, many other institutions reenforce." The perverse worldviews and prejudices of the left dominate academia and they filter down to the churches, the creative arts and the mass media.

I've posted this before. A story in Don Quixote (Chapter 51). Basically, there is a bridge at which anyone that wants to pass must make a statement of truth. If the statement is false, then by law the person must be executed by being hanged on the gallows that stands near the ludicrously governed bridge.

So one day, a clever itinerant decides to walk the long way, rather than take his usual route to the next town, in order to test the law, the order, getting to the bridge and declaring, "I will be executed on these gallows today, according to your law."

What could the rulers do in order to enforce the law? If they executed him, they would be executing a man who had told them the truth, and therefore violated their law which prohibited doing exactly such a thing. If they let him pass, he would have gotten away with a lie, and crossing the bridge getting away with it. The point is that the whole setup has to be done away with rather than carried on absurdom ad infinitum.

I believe that we must overthrow those that work to overthrow America and replace it in everything but in name (and eventually, even that, carrying their course consistently). I don't see that it is too much to demand the overthrow of the rule of the libs in America's educational institutions, from America's most important institutions, since they demand and work towards the overthrow of our nation.

Popular culture is one thing, but law is another. The re-definition of marriage by libs via government is another instance of their resort to SCIENTISM (the inappropriate application of the methods of natural science...) and therefore coercion, against society, while the Constitutional defense of marriage is society's rightful and obligatory measure in promoting beneficial social mores and standards.

[cgbg]

Welcome, fellow gloom and doomer.

;-)

I keep thinking about the Clinton's marriage. Here are two people legally married who cheat on each other more than they see each other and yet are treated in the media as a normal married couple.

If they respected the institution in the slightest they would divorce.

They mock marriage, and one is a former President, and one hopes (plots) to be a future President.

I believe their negative role model is very important--and has made a significant contribution to undermining that institution.

Hillary--and her feminist supporters--must be very pleased with themselves.