Posted on 05/12/2005 11:53:33 PM PDT by doug from upland
I was thinking of trying to attend tomorrow.
Why is it that so many are willing to make excuses for the Clintons, but then again considering the source there isn't much to wonder about. BTW, good try Doug, an open mind is good thing, it's just too bad you weren't dealing with someone who also had one.
bttt
BTTT
Each of these characters is either a convicted felon or an indicted and 'gonna be felon.' And these are the people on whom our former president and current junior senator from NY relied...that the press is not tearing into this is just a horrible indictment of the main stream media...the MSM is clearly just a shill organization for the Democrats and the Clintons...awful, just awful.
This is a joke, didn't the Judge go out of his way to make some very strage statements already?
He did indeed.
The Judge was appointed by the Clintons and managed to already call John Paul a notorious character and called Hillary free from sin before a single word of this trial went forward, right?
How does he get away with staying in this case?
I have hardly seen a better case proving conflict of interest for a trial than this Judge who starts off with these statements.
Go for it, Doug. Just shower afterwards, and you'll not catch anything : )
Gee, watching democrat thugs try to weasel out of a mess with the help of greasy lawyers...sure you don't have anything better to do, like, say, put air in your tires or maybe change the filter in your air conditioner?
But, then again, a FReeper onsite to report on the goings on would be educational. Alright, but I must warn you...the pay is low.
Sandler is obviously more interested in protecting Hillary than he is in defending Rosen. I find it hard to believe Rosen hasn't figured this out. If Rosen doesn't take the stand and implicate Hillary, he is screwed. Then again, maybe he knows his life is on the line if he doesn't go down quietly.
This is how gov't prsecutors usually work. They find a pig that squeals and offer him something in exchange for his testimony. It is rather odd for a Clintonite to go for this traditional bait. They usually lie, forget and do some time rather than squeal. I wonder what's up?
I must wonder who appointed the judge who will sentence him? It sure seems nobody in Washington is ever really held responsible . . .
Yep, sounds like a Clinton guy alright.
But he is hoping a sentencing judge will look favorably on him because of his cooperation in Mr. Rosen's case, he said.
More likely he hopes the Clintons were able to dig up something on the judge and told him to go easy on the the guy.
Hopefully all of the truth will finally get out
The Clymers at the NY Slimes are really on this story, eh? You can tell they love reporting it. Hehehehehe...
Actually, it struck me funny that they slant it to sound like Rosen's circle of pals instead of the Clintons. Still applying the teflon.
I am shocked that this appeared in the NY Times. There has been a blackout on this story. If Trent Lott or Tom Delay had the same type of situtation, this would be front page news for a month.
Leslie, you ignorant slut.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.