Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump calls Freedom Tower "Disgusting Pile of Junk"
MSNBC ^

Posted on 05/12/2005 8:55:27 PM PDT by grizzly84

MATTHEWS: What role are you going to take? I mean, you're not a sidewalk superintendent. You're Donald Trump. I mean, what role—will you lead a coalition to stop Governor Pataki from his strong support for the Freedom Tower? TRUMP: Well, there's not much of a role I can take. It all started when the “New York Post” called me and asked my opinion. It's really a shame. We have a great opportunity. And, you know the terrorists win. If we build this job the way it is, the terrorists win. If we rebuild the World Trade Center, but a story taller and stronger, then we win. I mean, I don't want to have the terrorists win, Chris. And that's what's going to happen if we build this pile of junk.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donaldtrump; freedomtower; idiot; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Just a little sample of the transcript between Trump and Matthews. Thoughts? I'm not an architect, but the idea of rebuilding the towers better and stronger sounds more sensible than this new fangled design. It sounds like Trump might be using this issue as a launching point into politics, since he's essentially taking on Pataki.
1 posted on 05/12/2005 8:55:28 PM PDT by grizzly84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

As far as I'm concerned, Chris Matthews is a disgusting pile of junk.


2 posted on 05/12/2005 8:58:39 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Leftists would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84
If we rebuild the World Trade Center, but a story taller and stronger, then we win.

That's exactly what we should do. If it was in a red state, that is what we woulddo. But, in artsy-fartsy NYC... we get this abstract sculpture thingy.

3 posted on 05/12/2005 9:01:23 PM PDT by Stonedog (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's difficult to pronounce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

Nah, The T is being honest. And who doesn't agree with him? Pataki is a tool.


4 posted on 05/12/2005 9:04:35 PM PDT by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84
Trump is right. The guy knows more about New York City real estate than anyone. Let the Donald handle the building and make it the biggest and best thing in the world.
5 posted on 05/12/2005 9:10:49 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (You must respect my a-tor-it-tah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

I think he's looking in the mirror. What a maroon.


6 posted on 05/12/2005 9:21:44 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Theodore: the GOOD Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84
Personally, I believe this design will work best as an adequate replacement to the towers.


7 posted on 05/12/2005 9:33:38 PM PDT by wolicy_ponk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

I thought it was announce the freedom tower is off the table due to "security issues" (I think they were just embarrassed and needed an excuse)

The towers have meaning beyond architecture.


8 posted on 05/12/2005 9:39:28 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

More here...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1401315/posts


9 posted on 05/12/2005 9:47:02 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, let the Constitution do the talkin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84; All

"...disgusting pile of junk." ???

Was he talking about the proposed building, or his hairdo?


10 posted on 05/12/2005 9:48:23 PM PDT by shibumi (I' goth en' haba goth - haba mellon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolicy_ponk
I think, you need to give some here a hint, why this design would be appropriate in defiance towards the terrorist.
Hint ? it's suppose to resemble a hand gesture.
11 posted on 05/12/2005 9:49:27 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84
He's right, and it is a pile of junk. An unambitious, timid, ugly, decided by committee pile of junk. Considering how much is at stake in this symbolically, the whole process has been a disgrace.
12 posted on 05/12/2005 9:50:55 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

Trumps knows about building a bunch of squares. He's not an architect. The minute you make this thing political (and it was political before the old ones even fell), you open it up to all these "commissions" who would be aghast to have two long straight boxes pointing up to the sky. Sorry, Trump. You know it's true.


13 posted on 05/12/2005 9:51:38 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolicy_ponk

as long as it is facing east... but i can't decide if it should be a bit to the north towards france or a bit to the south towards saudi arabia, et al... so maybe just due east to cover them all


14 posted on 05/12/2005 10:01:20 PM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

REBUILD THE TOWERS! We don't need that Garman homo's silly design. Build the Twin Towers according to the new (stronger) proposal, and put the Department of Homeland Security and Hillary's office on the very top, to insure tenants' potential ease of mind.


15 posted on 05/12/2005 10:06:41 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84

REBUILD THE TOWERS! We don't need that German homo's silly design. Build the Twin Towers according to the new (stronger) proposal, and put the Department of Homeland Security and Hillary's office on the very top, to insure tenants' potential ease of mind.


16 posted on 05/12/2005 10:06:51 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
An unambitious, timid, ugly, decided by committee pile of junk.

Well said!!! I hope The Donald's blunt comments raise some eyebrows and call attention to the sheer crappiness of the present project before it is really begun. Build the Towers as they were -- only better. The Towers were tested to destruction. We ought to know now how to make them stronger and more fireproof. Nothing would stick in the craw of those who hate America more than seeing the Towers rise again.

17 posted on 05/12/2005 10:25:55 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stonedog

It's part of that weepy grieving and healing BS that's infected us, along with all of the "candle light vigils" (Gag me now...)


18 posted on 05/12/2005 10:33:17 PM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84



19 posted on 05/12/2005 11:32:39 PM PDT by stradivarius ("If a donkey brays at you, don't bray at him." - George Herbert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

Egg-zackally. A monument to pusillanimity is what I
would call it ( if I could spell it. )


20 posted on 05/12/2005 11:55:41 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson