Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balrog666

Are you trying to say that your pose #835 is not an endorsement of the IT when you say "As I have stated before, the Fairtax would reduce my current costs by about 4% and that is without considering any additional taxes imposed on my overhead costs including rent, advertising, utilities, fuel, and capital equipment. And without adding the NRST back on top of my prices."?

Sure sounds exactly like that to me, but of course I'm stupid. I don't even know what you refer to when you talk of "other options on the table". I take that to mean realistic ones ... what might they be? The Nightmare VAT/Flat perhaps?

Also, the "automatic" raising you mention to accomodate skyrocketing liberal spending is nowhere in the FairTax bill. There's no point in fighting the spending battle until the tax system can be brought under control since with the IT, the tax-raising can easily enough be hidden by a great variety of means - and the citizens needn't know so they blame the pols (as obviously you don't).


942 posted on 05/22/2005 1:09:11 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies ]


To: pigdog
Are you trying to say that your pose #835 is not an endorsement of the IT when you say "As I have stated before, the Fairtax would reduce my current costs by about 4% and that is without considering any additional taxes imposed on my overhead costs including rent, advertising, utilities, fuel, and capital equipment. And without adding the NRST back on top of my prices."?

Gosh, are you retarded or something? Just where in my post do you see the income tax mentioned?

Sure sounds exactly like that to me, but of course I'm stupid.

As you demonstrate again and again.

I don't even know what you refer to when you talk of "other options on the table". I take that to mean realistic ones ... what might they be? The Nightmare VAT/Flat perhaps?

Proud of your ignorance are you? You can remedy it at www.taxreformpanel.gov, if you are not afraid to do so.

Also, the "automatic" raising you mention to accomodate skyrocketing liberal spending is nowhere in the FairTax bill.

I suppose another demonstration of your ignorance must make you feel really good.

See Section 101 at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-25 and then read the definition of the annual rates to be determined by the Social Security Administration. You might also want to read the section on the (at least) annual meetings to “improve” the system.

There's no point in fighting the spending battle until the tax system can be brought under control since with the IT, the tax-raising can easily enough be hidden by a great variety of means - and the citizens needn't know so they blame the pols (as obviously you don't).

Given up already, have you? Yes, the NRST is for those who have already surrendered to the socialist state.

946 posted on 05/22/2005 1:49:26 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson