Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. keeps Kitty Hawk, JFK on deck
Japan Times ^ | The Japan Times: May 12, 2005

Posted on 05/12/2005 6:34:16 AM PDT by Paul_Denton

WASHINGTON (Kyodo) The U.S. Congress passed a measure Tuesday effectively requiring the Defense Department to keep the two remaining conventional aircraft carriers -- the USS Kitty Hawk and USS John F. Kennedy -- as candidates for deployment in Japan unless the Japanese government agrees to host a nuclear-powered carrier. The measure is included in an $82 billion supplementary spending bill for fiscal 2005 approved by the Senate on Tuesday and passed by the House of Representatives last week.

The extra budget, mainly for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, will be finalized with the signature of President George W. Bush.

With the Japan-based Kitty Hawk scheduled to be retired in 2008, its replacement has become a sensitive issue due to strong opposition in Japan against hosting nuclear-powered vessels.

The U.S. Navy recently reversed its plan to deploy a nuclear-powered carrier and came up with two options -- keeping the Kitty Hawk on active duty or replacing it with the JFK.

The Japan Times: May 12, 2005 (C) All rights reserved


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: japan; navy; ussjohnfkennedy; usskittyhawk

1 posted on 05/12/2005 6:34:16 AM PDT by Paul_Denton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton; DTogo

Ping.


2 posted on 05/12/2005 6:34:31 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
With the Japan-based Kitty Hawk scheduled to be retired in 2008, its replacement has become a sensitive issue due to strong opposition in Japan against hosting nuclear-powered vessels.

Do the protesters whine about Japan's nuclear power plants?

3 posted on 05/12/2005 6:44:24 AM PDT by demlosers (Rumsfeld: "We don't have an exit strategy, we have a victory strategy.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

i gots me an idear!

pull all of them out of Japan. while we're at it, pull all our military out of Japan.

Let Japan deal with an increasingly hostile China, North Korea, etc..


4 posted on 05/12/2005 6:46:14 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Do the protesters whine about Japan's nuclear power plants?

I have no idea why they whine about nuke powered carriers but not their own nuke plants.

5 posted on 05/12/2005 6:48:24 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: camle
No we need Japan's help against China and to protect Taiwan, and to protect South Korea (however ungreatful its population is) from North Korea. We need Japan's help against China and North Korea and Japan needs us if/when they come under attack by one of both. Japan is also the front line for the National Missile Defense system. Taiwan has anti-ballistic missile weapons that could and should be integrated into the US-Japan system.

China is already in Panama (Thanks Carter) and South America. We need to maintain our own forces on their doorstep, which we do by basing the 7th fleet in Japan.

6 posted on 05/12/2005 6:52:00 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
Your absolutely right. It is silly.
But the times they are a changing in Japan and if NK blows up a nuke, they will probably let us station a Nimitz class in Yokosuka.
Also there is a plan to put JSFs on LHAs which are deployed in Sasebo Japan as they come on line.
7 posted on 05/12/2005 6:53:14 AM PDT by ProudVet77 (Warning: Frequent sarcastic posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

Speaking of CHICOMS in Panama ... I was driving up Military Highway (near Norfolk) and saw a Panamainian (eh spl??) flagged ship (garbage hauler) that had a Chinese name (that I forget right now.)


8 posted on 05/12/2005 6:56:23 AM PDT by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
I wasn't aware of Japan protesting nuclear powered vessels, but rather nuclear armed vessels. I thought the policy was to keep any nuclear munitions out of Japanese territory (ships, planes, cargo), or at least not confirm/deny that nukes are on such vessel/ship, etc.
9 posted on 05/12/2005 7:29:45 AM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

I can hear the screams already. Better then hanging them up by their thumbs and applying the hot irons. I wonder what would happen to the West Pac economy if all our troops came home and the back door subsidy came home with them. I’m doubting that it would be a big deal in Japan but in some of the other locations the base is the only reason they keep the lights on. Does anybody have any numbers on the payroll we drop on the host countries? I’ve always been curious of that one.


10 posted on 05/12/2005 7:44:39 AM PDT by grayforkbeard (If it’s not controversial, how can we learn from it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
wasn't aware of Japan protesting nuclear powered vessels, but rather nuclear armed vessels. I thought the policy was to keep any nuclear munitions out of Japanese territory (ships, planes, cargo), or at least not confirm/deny that nukes are on such vessel/ship, etc.

I never knew that. I always thought they were against nuclear powered vessels. But that will change real fast if North Korea sets off a nuke.

11 posted on 05/12/2005 7:01:32 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

First time their rabid neighbors come after them; minds will change and they will recover their sanity and realize what kind of world we live in!


12 posted on 05/12/2005 7:16:31 PM PDT by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

If the Japs do not agree, sell the two carriers to China. They will get the message.


13 posted on 05/12/2005 7:20:53 PM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson