You obviously did not READ anything stated here.
Why not REREAD the ENTIRE post.
ELF is famous for burning houses, Earth First is famous for burning houses.
Both groups have killed ppeople.
No, it is not a simple matter of disagreement, it is a matter of right and wrong, and who is more important people or animals.
ELF, Earth First, and envirowackies in general see ALL human technology as a threat to pristine peaceful animals living in harmony with nature and each other.
Build wind turbines for electricity?
NEVER!
WHy not?
"Birds MIGHT fly into them and be killed!"
Pebble bed nuclear reactors that are pretty much meltdown proof?
Not on your life!
Why not?
"Nuclear power is an evil in all it's forms!"
Again, I used ot BE an enviro.
Trying to feed me a line of BS about how I'm over-reacting and jumping to conclusions on envirowackies won't work.
"ELF is famous for burning houses, Earth First is famous for burning houses.
Both groups have killed ppeople."
Ok, where do earth firth and ELF come in here? If involved, which is highly doubtful, they wouldn't kill fish at a hatchery, they would bust dams to save salmon.
"No, it is not a simple matter of disagreement, it is a matter of right and wrong, and who is more important people or animals."
Why does an issue of someone killing fish have anything to do with "people vs. animals?" It would seem to me that killing these steelhead hurts people too.
"ELF, Earth First, and envirowackies in general see ALL human technology as a threat to pristine peaceful animals living in harmony with nature and each other."
I agree that dams, freeways, mass developments, etc.. are a threat to animals. It doesn't take an "enviro-whacko" to see this. In fact, most hunters and anglers agree. Why then aren't they called enviro-whackos? They don't like overgrazing or erosion either and they promote things such as natural corridors as well, to allow for wild animals to have unbroken wilderness areas when developers home in on a natural area. So why don't you call them whackos? Because they hunt? When I take my camera with me to photograph wildlife I am hunting too, non-lethally.
"Build wind turbines for electricity?
NEVER!
WHy not?
"Birds MIGHT fly into them and be killed!"
Pebble bed nuclear reactors that are pretty much meltdown proof?
Not on your life!
Why not?
"Nuclear power is an evil in all it's forms!"
I promote nuclear energy and natural gas. Few conservationists oppose wind turbines.
"Again, I used ot BE an enviro.
Trying to feed me a line of BS about how I'm over-reacting and jumping to conclusions on envirowackies won't work."
It's not a line. You are taking the most extreme positions from the smallest, most extreme groups and claiming all environmentalists share their views. They do not.