Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
I suppose you all are great fans of the Soviets and were so glad they dominated Poland, but I agree with Mr. Buchanan that WWII started out to help Poland, but it's a shame that Poland got lost in the whole deal.

Hitler's aims toward the Polish people was clearly genocidal. After 50 years of National Socialism Poland would have been a nation of model Aryan communities, and what Poles remained would have resided in slave labor camps. They suffered under both regiemes, imo the idea that they would have been "better off" under Hitler demeans that suffering

132 posted on 05/11/2005 10:52:32 AM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
[The Poles] suffered under both regiemes, imo the idea that they would have been "better off" under Hitler demeans that suffering

In reading the actual column, I didn't get the impression that he was arguing "better off" with Nazis; the impression I get is that he was saying, "lost of good lives were lost, yet it didn't save the Poles from having to endure tyranny--one was replaced with another"...it seems that we all went home with a "victory"--having successfully struck back after a surprise attack against us--but it was not really much of a victory for the Poles. In fact, the columnist is rather sympathetic toward the Poles' plight...

I think that people who complain have quite a prejudice against the author or else just believe that only Americans matter, and those Poles and Jews and Latvians, etc., are nothing.

315 posted on 05/11/2005 5:47:20 PM PDT by Gondring (Pretend you don't know me...I'm in the WPPFF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson