Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The leaning tower of PBS
Los Angeles Times ^ | 9 May 2005 | By Matea Gold, Times Staff Writer

Posted on 05/09/2005 6:07:28 PM PDT by MaryInSacto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
The Rats in public broadcasting are feeling the heat. Nonetheless, one paragraph in this article gives me great pause: "Tomlinson said he is not out to kill any PBS programs, and John Lawson, chief executive officer of the Assn. of Public Television Stations, said he has not observed any attempts to do so."

My question is: Why *isn't* he out to kill programs that promote the lies of the Bedwetting Left? I defy anyone here to supply a good reason that my tax money should be supporting programs that support the fallacy of "global warming" (Nova, Nature), the evils of US foreign policy (Frontline), historical revisionism (American Experience,) advocacy of socialism (Now,) promotion of the queer agenda (Postcards From Buster.)

Despite the fact that Republicans are now in charge a tiny group of Leftists -- BTW, can someone explain to me why Bill Moyers isn't in jail for treason and slander? -- are given a taxpayer funded megaphone to spread lies that undermine this country at a time of great peril.

As I see it, there are three potential solutions to this problem. All three involve a Congressional mandate to the FCC that EVERY one of those PBS and NPR licenses be ripped away from their current owners. This shouldn't be a problem since I believe some competent lawyering would lead the Supreme Court to determine that the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 is illegal for the same reasons that the Voice of America is statutorily prohibited from broadcasting its programs into the country.

Solution 1 is the Spoils to the Victor approach. It would hand over the licenses to a consortium of leading conservative think tanks expressly for the purpose of broadcasting educational programs about civics, US history and the fundamental role of Christianity in this country.

Solution 2 is rooted in Moral Values. It would make the license available at a deeply discounted price to religious broadcasters (Buddhists, Hindus, Moslems, Druids need not apply.)

Solution 3 is a Fiscal solution. It would simply sell the frequencies by auction to cell phone or wireless Internet companies. The proceeds would used to pay for war efforts.

Or, any combination of the above would work for me.

1 posted on 05/09/2005 6:07:31 PM PDT by MaryInSacto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto

I like some of Public Broadcasting shows...but the easiest way to do it (so noone can complain) is to cut government funding.


2 posted on 05/09/2005 6:12:18 PM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto
'Leaning tower'? Raze it. Money saved. Problem solved. 'Nuff said.


3 posted on 05/09/2005 6:12:27 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Help Nature to thin the herd. Eat a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto

PBS is almost as liberal as the state department.


4 posted on 05/09/2005 6:14:42 PM PDT by RobbyS (JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
"Why isn't he out to kill programs that promote the lies of the bedwetting left?"

Sometimes a death by a thousand cuts is easier to achieve than a single knockout blow.
5 posted on 05/09/2005 6:16:47 PM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto

they sound like a trader joe's ad.


6 posted on 05/09/2005 6:19:59 PM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto
Why do we even need Public television and radio.

And, by the way, how'd you like that wacky weather today?

7 posted on 05/09/2005 6:20:46 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Leftists would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

Just cut a couple of million from Moyer's salary. You'd have PLENTY of dough to fund the leftist house organ PBS.


8 posted on 05/09/2005 6:24:52 PM PDT by boop (Testing the tagline feature!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto
BooHoo.

Let PBS wait till 2008 and tnediserp hillary.

Then they can go all gay all day and no one will have any say.

I say off them (from the federal budget) asap. If I want to hear from old communists I'll look at my old pravda's or the boston globe.
9 posted on 05/09/2005 6:26:21 PM PDT by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto
*Liberals see a conservative bent and vice versa.

Yeah, well, liberals see CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, the NY Times, The LA Times and the Washington Post as having a conservative bent too.

That's because liberals live in Bizarro World.


10 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:47 PM PDT by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto

I like all those ideas. One could add give it to an interim team of Dennis Miller, Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham. And they would have absolute control over the entire operation.
I'm sure they'd know what to do with it, until funds can be cut off or diverted to something productive.


11 posted on 05/09/2005 6:37:54 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto

WGBH, the PBS station in Boston, seems to be doing quite well financially. Here's a link to info about their spiffy new headquarters:

http://main.wgbh.org/wgbh/about/history/brighton.html


12 posted on 05/09/2005 6:39:14 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto
Mitchell would not comment on her conversations with Tomlinson, but noted that polls taken by both Republican and Democratic polling firms have found the vast majority of the public believes PBS is objective.

"We have all the evidence in the world that Americans see the schedule as balanced and free of bias," she said.

This is a joke, right? The Left is totally clueless.

13 posted on 05/09/2005 6:39:28 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

"I like some of Public Broadcasting shows...but the easiest way to do it (so noone can complain) is to cut government funding. "

Not cut, eliminate. If they had to compete fairly, they would die.


14 posted on 05/09/2005 6:40:00 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie
WGBH, the PBS station in Boston, seems to be doing quite well financially.

Nice little scam, WGBH. Of course, this is the very same WGBH where, during their Presidential election coverage in 1992, broke out into applause when it was announced that Clinton had enough electoral votes to defeat George HW Bush.

15 posted on 05/09/2005 6:45:52 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
polling firms have found the vast majority of the public believes PBS is objective.

well since their objective is nonstop Republician Bashing i'd sat they were right...

16 posted on 05/09/2005 6:46:47 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MaryInSacto
GET RID OF PBS...PERIOD.

No more tax dollars to the government supported waste of money.

If Big bird and cookie mnster want to continue on...let the money from all the sales of products support it.

If it cannot support itself, then so be it.

17 posted on 05/09/2005 6:49:52 PM PDT by Radioactive (I'm on the radio..so I'm radioactive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Death to NPR/PBS ping!


18 posted on 05/09/2005 6:50:37 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Get back into your closets, you pinkos! We're setting the way-back machine for the fabulous fifties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: MaryInSacto
For the past seven or eight years I have typically surfed to Washington Week on PBS on Friday night. The hostess is Gwen Ifil. Previously it was Ken Bode, who has just been named as an ombusdman by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (fox guarding the henhouse).

There are typically four "panelists" on the program. I defy anyone to name for me any panelist in the last seven or eight years who ever, ever voted for a Republican.

Panelists are typically from the NY Times, WAPost, Time, ad nauseum. Never, ever someone from the Washington Times, Weekly Standard, National Review, etc.. It's as if these media outlets just don't exist.

Simple solution: DEFUND PBS AND NPR.

20 posted on 05/09/2005 7:07:21 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson