Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BIGLOOK

Roger that. It would be interesting to hear from the Nav gang on a sub... though... I suspect it is closer to surface nav than we might have guessed. Charts is charts... :-)


34 posted on 05/09/2005 7:38:29 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius
Just a thought. We've seen the pics off the sub's sonar dome stoved in on the port side. Doesn't look like a head on strike. But hell, I wouldn't like 15' of an A/C I was flying in to hit anything.

I give the Captain and Crew a BZ for getting SF under control and returning to port. I know the Navy is unforgiving in these incidents. I read the mixed message in the Admiral's remarks in this thread.

I've friends who are former submariners but not NAV who tell me there's a preprogrammed course plot and redundant systems. There are changes in the sea floor over time; if that chart was from 1960 and that sea mount grew 10 feet....well, go figure.

Good chat, Ramius. Let's see what we can find out.

38 posted on 05/09/2005 8:14:06 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson