Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Electoral Trifecta [Bush, Blair, & Howard]
Weekly Standard ^ | May 16, 2005 | William Kristol

Posted on 05/09/2005 11:48:18 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

So it turns out Madrid was the exception, not the rule. On March 14, 2004, the party of Spanish prime minister José María Aznar was defeated at the polls after an al Qaeda attack in Madrid and after a campaign in which the opposition fiercely criticized Aznar for Spain's involvement in the war to remove Saddam Hussein. In the wake of its electoral victory, the new leftist government withdrew Spain's troops from Iraq.

The question, a year ago, was this: Was Spain a harbinger of electoral defeat for the other democratic leaders of the war to liberate Iraq? Some hoped it would be, and have been severely disappointed. President Bush did not flinch in Iraq and was reelected with a stronger showing than four years before. Australia's John Howard, a steadfast supporter of the war in Iraq, was reelected to a historic fourth term as prime minister with an increased majority. And last week Britain's Tony Blair won a third term, the first Labour prime minister ever to do so.

Blair won with a diminished majority, to be sure. Yet the main opposition party, the Tories, supported the war as well. So roughly 68 percent of the British electorate voted for parties with pro-war leaders. The Liberal Democrats, critics of the war who pledged a quick withdrawal from Iraq, did increase their vote by about 4 percentage points, but still received only 22 percent of the vote.

The electorates of the major democracies--at least the English-speaking ones--have thus shown a willingness to support the leaders who took them to war. This despite the fact that no operational weapons of mass destruction were found, and despite the difficulties of the last couple of years in Iraq.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alliedforces; blair; bush; howard; labour; liberal; republican; wariniraq; waronterror

1 posted on 05/09/2005 11:48:22 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

It is interesting that the three most stalwart allies are English-speaking countries. Perhaps it's a difference of cultures or understanding of global uncertainties that prevents other nations from realizing the need for the elimination of Hussein's regime. Then again, it could be just jealousy or resentment of the English-speaking cultures.


2 posted on 05/09/2005 12:41:21 PM PDT by loreldan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

So much for all that paper tiger stuff.


3 posted on 05/09/2005 8:40:48 PM PDT by texasflower ("America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one." President George W. Bush 01/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
BTW how did Howard Dean do???

Pray for W and Our Troops

4 posted on 05/09/2005 8:42:46 PM PDT by bray (Pray for Iraq's Freedom from Mohammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson