Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Beaupre is stubborn, crazy, and a hypocritical, sanctimonious, Republican editorialist.

How can this sanctimonious hypocrite write such crap without even once mentioning the word "Clinton" and stating whether President Clinton's supported impeachment or not?

1 posted on 05/09/2005 10:49:37 AM PDT by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MurryMom
"Call me stubborn, but I'm not going to be stampeded into making moral judgments on other people's private lives in the columns of this newspaper."

I call you illogical and stupid!

What goes on when no one is watching is MORE telling about the CHARACTER of a person then when they are reading a prepared speech and kissing babies to "look good."

The life of someone in public office especially, funded by TAX PAYER dollars is MY business. I'm tired of political, hypocritical whores and ridiculous people like YOU.
2 posted on 05/09/2005 10:53:41 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom

Clinton's crime wasn't philandering. His was lying and obstruction of justice in a civil case.

I hear what you're saying, but it's apples and oranges.


3 posted on 05/09/2005 10:53:48 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom

Bill Clinton had an affair with an underling. That would be classified as sexual harassment in any office situation.

Actually he propositioned more women in the office. Monica was the one who swallowed the bait.

Consider too that he bribed her to stay quiet with a job from his Revlon buddy.


4 posted on 05/09/2005 10:53:52 AM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom
Yawn.

if a politician can't honor his marriage vows, why should I believe that he'll honor his oath of office?

His personal life is highly relevant and the voters deserve to know about it.

5 posted on 05/09/2005 10:56:09 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom
Beaupre is stubborn, crazy, and a hypocritical, sanctimonious, Republican editorialist.

How can this sanctimonious hypocrite write such vacuous verbiage without even once mentioning the word "Clinton" and stating whether he supported President Clinton's impeachment or not?

(corrected version)

6 posted on 05/09/2005 10:57:35 AM PDT by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom

What really annoyed me about Clinton is that the law he violated was one that he'd signed with a fair amount of hoopla about how he was helping victims of sexual harrassment get justice.


7 posted on 05/09/2005 10:57:59 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom

He should resign or be expelled from office, along with every Democrat or Republican who behaves this way.


8 posted on 05/09/2005 10:58:05 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom

Hmmmmn.

The politicianmust have been a democrat.

Or a woman.

Or, more likely, a liberal republican.

(Had it been a male, conservative, republican, the WHORLD would have been told.


10 posted on 05/09/2005 11:03:21 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom
"Where is the connection between the politician's private moral life and his public performance? "

When you grow up and have children you will know

12 posted on 05/09/2005 11:20:03 AM PDT by Mr. K (some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom

So who was it?


13 posted on 05/09/2005 11:36:57 AM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom
I suppose there is no harm in summarizing it as a back-rub gone bad.

Aw jeez, is Chuck Robb in the news again?

15 posted on 05/09/2005 11:40:23 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom
How can this sanctimonious hypocrite write such crap without even once mentioning the word "Clinton"

This editorial is about Don Sherwood, yet Beaupre does not even mention his name ONCE throughout this entire editorial,  so why would he mention Clinton?

Also, it's interesting to note that this is the first time the Scranton Times even MENTIONED  the Sherwood controversy (the Scranton Times  is the largest paper in Sherwood's  congressional district). The Times Leader (Wilkes-Barre) has already had several articles on this.

BTW, Sherwood DID support Clinton's impeachment.

16 posted on 05/09/2005 12:44:39 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("Mr. Chamberlain loves the working man, he loves to see him work" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson