[js1138]

The article conveniently fails to point out that it is at the biomolecular level that Neodarwinism’s fallacy is especially apparent. So much so, in fact, that Francis Crick postulated DNA must have been deposited on Earth by spaceships

And you conveniently fail to reveal what you've been smokng.

[mikeus_maximus]

,i>The article conveniently fails to point out that it is at the biomolecular level that Neodarwinism’s fallacy is especially apparent. So much so, in fact, that Francis Crick postulated DNA must have been deposited on Earth by spaceships

And you conveniently fail to reveal what you've been smokng.

Obviouly, you've never heard of Directed Panspermia. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/SC/Views/Exhibit/narrative/neurobiology.html Fantastic, isn't it? It's what Crick was left with, when the years of DNA studies subsequent to his 1952 discovery showed the natural origin of DNA to be a mere fantasy.