[mikeus_maximus]

,i>The article conveniently fails to point out that it is at the biomolecular level that Neodarwinism’s fallacy is especially apparent. So much so, in fact, that Francis Crick postulated DNA must have been deposited on Earth by spaceships

And you conveniently fail to reveal what you've been smokng.

Obviouly, you've never heard of Directed Panspermia. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/SC/Views/Exhibit/narrative/neurobiology.html Fantastic, isn't it? It's what Crick was left with, when the years of DNA studies subsequent to his 1952 discovery showed the natural origin of DNA to be a mere fantasy.

[js1138]

Ah yes, the aliens. When confronted with an unsolved problem in science, call upon aliens, or magic.

[Phocion]

In directed panspermia, DNA still arises from inorganic molecules at some point on some planet. It just means aliens seeded Earth. The idea that DNA has always existed is cosmic ancestry, an idea rejected by about as many scientists who reject young-earth creationism. Crick did not believe in cosmic ancestry, IIRC.