To: ILurkedIRegisteredIPosted
Yes, let's completely ignore the quality of the code and design principles that were involved because we know that all programs inherently equal...
Straw man. Nobody is saying that. Point me to a post that says that, if you disagree. Similarly, there is no evidence that Firefox or Safari or any other browser is based on inherently better design principles. If you believe that, that's your opinion, not a fact.
So, here's what we can do. Every time FireFox or Safari or whatever releases a slew of security patches -- and they're going to happen frequently from now on -- you can remind all of us how much better FireFox and Safari's design principles are. At least, we'll all get a good laugh out of it.
25 posted on
05/09/2005 9:36:47 AM PDT by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
Straw man. Nobody is saying that. Point me to a post that says that, if you disagree. OK. Post #8 in this very thread.
He not only used the word "Only," but he bolded it and used all-caps.
That pretty much means that he considers all code to be equally insecure.
31 posted on
05/09/2005 10:25:20 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Bush2000
Straw man. Nobody is saying that. Point me to a post that says that, if you disagree. hmm how about this " The ONLY reason Firefox and the Mac browsers are "safer" is simply because they are not used extensively enough for hackers to bother with them!..
Bold and Uppercase...
66 posted on
05/12/2005 12:59:57 PM PDT by
N3WBI3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson