Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Launch Date for First Solar Sail due Monday
slashdot ^ | Saturday May 07, @08:42AM | Zonk

Posted on 05/09/2005 3:56:43 AM PDT by Arkie2

"The Planetary Society (home of SETI) is planning to launch the first Solar Sail Spacecraft, Cosmos 1, later this month. The exact launch date is scheduled to be announced on Monday, May 9. This event represents one of the first privately-funded space missions with the objective of pure research. It will be launched from a Russian submarine in the Barents Sea. The spacecraft consists of a body surrounded by 8 triangular sails, that will use the tiny force of reflected sunlight to (potentially) accelerate to tremendous speeds. Unfortunately, the craft is not expected to leave Earth's orbit due to degradation of the mylar materials, but should be a proof of concept for subsequent missions."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: planetarysociety; soalrsails; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Arkie2

It's certainly more interesting than NASA's old flyin' bread truck.


21 posted on 05/09/2005 11:22:01 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

The Mylar film on this flight is actually obsolete. NASA is testing a much thinner, tougher, lighter material. Anything to reduce the weight will increase the performance.

Although they will be passing into the Earth's shadow repeatedly on this flight eclipses won't be a problem in deep space.

If you want updated info on what NASA is doing with their solar sail research visit their home page. There's some interesting info there.


22 posted on 05/09/2005 11:23:36 AM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: norraad

Some variation of a bread truck will still be necessary to get all this stuff in orbit! The UPS truck isn't very sexy (even if they do want to race it) but it's key to their success.


23 posted on 05/09/2005 11:26:16 AM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Better to use the shuttle transport jet to get it to near orbit than those old fashioned rockets.

Each launch "hurts" the ozone layer more than r-12 ever did.

I think about that each summer wishin' my dash output temp was a little colder.

24 posted on 05/09/2005 11:42:27 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper

"a craft faster than the speed of light will be..."

Well, yes and no. I think cryogentic storage could get a living man there. We could also send wave after wave of supplies and materials with the intelligence to fly into orbit in preparation for our arrival in 10,000 years. We could also sidle up to a black hole, orbiting it during its progress through the galaxy, and find ourselves very far from our origin without aging very much because of relativistic gobbly-gook (I read something about this in a book by Robert Forward). Always have hope.


25 posted on 05/10/2005 10:32:52 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mudblood

"... without aging very much"

That would apply to the travelor but not to his wife and kids - right? In order to get there and get back without missing your kids funeral we have to go really fast.


26 posted on 05/10/2005 10:54:11 AM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: quesera

I lean toward agreeing with you. Not a waste of MY time and My money, but of somoene else's. THe reason I think it is a waste is that once they prove it works, others will copy it, just like the Wright Brothers.

While the Wright Brothers did the first powered flight, others copied and surpassed their design within months.


27 posted on 05/10/2005 11:02:48 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (Christian, Comedian, Husband,Opa, Dog Owner, former Cat Co-dweller, and all around good guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

I think a combination fusion/fission engine would be more efficient and affective.

Using solar sail production is like running a railroad with hand cars.


28 posted on 05/10/2005 11:06:50 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (Christian, Comedian, Husband,Opa, Dog Owner, former Cat Co-dweller, and all around good guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sensei Ern

Actually, there's a lot of exciting work going on in propulsion right now, from fission reactors to power ion engines, solar sails (including NASA work), propulsion that uses the solar magnetic field etc. I expect to see a lot of different ideas actually flying in the not to distant future. Ion propulsion has already been proven but with solar panels providing the necessary electrical power.


29 posted on 05/10/2005 11:11:52 AM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sensei Ern

Is your contention that no one should work on this because someone might improve on it?


30 posted on 05/10/2005 11:14:49 AM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper

"That would apply to the travelor but not to his wife and kids - right? In order to get there and get back without missing your kids funeral we have to go really fast."

Exactly, you'd have to go very fast. My comments sort of meant that it would be a one way trip - no coming back. Not like Star Wars :) I figure any instersteller voyage would be one way.


31 posted on 05/11/2005 11:24:21 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
"That pesky thing called physics keeps getting in the way."

You know, it would be REAL interesting to put something together and physically test this once and for all.

As Mass increases with velocity so would the mass of the propellant being pushed out of the nozzle. Kicking propellant out the nozzle of spaceship to increase speed is a hell of a lot different than pushing particles to speed in an accelerator.

32 posted on 05/11/2005 11:57:44 AM PDT by FireTrack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Not my contention at all. If someone wants to spend their own money, let them.


33 posted on 05/12/2005 5:58:09 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (Christian, Comedian, Husband,Opa, Dog Owner, former Cat Co-dweller, and all around good guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FireTrack
As Mass increases with velocity so would the mass of the propellant being pushed out of the nozzle. Kicking propellant out the nozzle of spaceship to increase speed is a hell of a lot different than pushing particles to speed in an accelerator.

It is a zero win situation. Mass will increase towards infinity as you approach the speed of light. Time also slows down. You will never reach the speed of light no matter how hard you try.

34 posted on 05/12/2005 6:48:19 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
"It is a zero win situation. Mass will increase towards infinity as you approach the speed of light. Time also slows down. You will never reach the speed of light no matter how hard you try."

Yep, I've heard/read all the theories. I'm proposing an practical experiment to try and prove it.

I think we could build a rocket with gravity assist that could possibly reach say 650,000 miles per hour which works out close to 1/1000th the speed of light.

At the above speed or maybe even less, we should be able to detect changes in the thrust required to increase or decrease velocity as compared to the thrust required at a much lower velocity.

This vehicle could also be used in other experiments to offset the costs such as validating the anomalies discovered by the pioneer probe and others as well as the novelty of establishing a new speed record for something built by the human race. :-)

35 posted on 05/12/2005 7:22:44 AM PDT by FireTrack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson