Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huge radioactive leak closes Thorp nuclear plant (No Danger To Public)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,2763,1479527,00.html ^ | Monday May 9, 2005 | Paul Brown

Posted on 05/08/2005 9:04:08 PM PDT by Deetes

A leak of highly radioactive nuclear fuel dissolved in concentrated nitric acid, enough to half fill an Olympic-size swimming pool, has forced the closure of Sellafield's Thorp reprocessing plant. The highly dangerous mixture, containing about 20 tonnes of uranium and plutonium fuel, has leaked through a fractured pipe into a huge stainless steel chamber which is so radioactive that it is impossible to enter.

Recovering the liquids and fixing the pipes will take months and may require special robots to be built and sophisticated engineering techniques devised to repair the £2.1bn plant.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boom; britain; chinasyndrome; energy; environment; nuclear; nuclearaccident; nuclearpower; ohpoop; ooopppsss; oops; oughtoh; radioactive; spill; uranium; wowzers

1 posted on 05/08/2005 9:04:08 PM PDT by Deetes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Deetes

Here's the government spokesman at the news conference:

http://ent.ity.org/images/mutants.jpg


2 posted on 05/08/2005 9:08:11 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Get back into your closets, you pinkos! We're setting the way-back machine for the fabulous fifties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deetes

Any unsafe geometry problems here?


3 posted on 05/08/2005 9:09:11 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
LOL

The company has set up a board of inquiry to find out how the leak occurred. The NII will set up a separate investigation and has the power to prosecute if correct procedures have not been followed.

Well that a start ...

4 posted on 05/08/2005 9:11:06 PM PDT by Deetes (Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Deetes
No danger to the public from a spilled 20 tons of Urnaium/plutonium mixture?

Tell you what -- if I lived within thirty miles of that place I and the family would make a spontaneous vacation to, say, Hawaii.
5 posted on 05/08/2005 9:16:10 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It does make one wonder. I was just quoting the story ...


6 posted on 05/08/2005 9:21:54 PM PDT by Deetes (Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The spokesman said there's nothing to worry about

7 posted on 05/08/2005 9:25:40 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Liberals are all heart, they care for everybody they care for and hate the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deetes
" Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) "

" In August 1997, the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate granted British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) the Consent to Operate its Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield. THORP, which has been operating since March 1994, has reprocessed well over 800 tonnes of fuel. THORP recovers usable uranium and plutonium from spent nuclear fuel. The main process areas are the fuel receipt and storage area, the head end plant where the fuel contents are separated out from the cladding, and the chemical plants where the uranium and plutonium are separated out from the waste products. BNFL plans to achieve a throughput of 900 tonnes by Thorp's fifth year and reprocess in all 7,000 tonnes of spent fuel in the first ten years, making at least £500 million profit after accounting for all decommissioning and capital costs. THORP is expected to reprocess 14,000 tonnes of spent fuel in its first 20 years of operations and in the order of 100 tonnes of plutonium will be recovered during this time. The exact quantity of plutonium will be dependent on the type of fuel and the level of irradiation in the reactor the fuel originates from. The company has over 15 years' worth of orders, valued at £12 billions, two thirds from overseas as well as the new AGR spent fuel contract. "

Sellafield

8 posted on 05/08/2005 9:37:31 PM PDT by Buddy B (MSgt Retired-USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deetes
Depending on the stainless steel alloy composition -- and the quality of the welds in that stainless catch-basin, those Brits should be concerned about having that much strong oxidizer (conc. HNO3) on the loose -- radioactive or not...

Not the sort of thing I'd want anywhere near my water supply...

9 posted on 05/08/2005 9:39:59 PM PDT by TXnMA (ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deetes

Fuel for the anti-nucs. Too bad because nuclear is the best way to go for energy.


10 posted on 05/08/2005 9:58:24 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
No danger to the public from a spilled 20 tons of Urnaium/plutonium mixture?

Because the leak was inside containment. That's why there's containment.

11 posted on 05/08/2005 10:03:02 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well, it leaked into a stainless steel containing vessel/chamber. For as long as that vessel does not leak, they have time to sort it out and clean the mess without endangering the locality. This is not a Chernobyl.


12 posted on 05/08/2005 10:21:52 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

But, This is the first ooopppsss I've heard of in a long long time. Not that it takes to many...


13 posted on 05/08/2005 10:44:01 PM PDT by Deetes (Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Deetes

I agree, however, do the ooops cause steps to be taken to correct future problems? I believe they do. Also, how often have we been reading of a natural gas explosion wiping out a house? You can bet if anything even remotely being associated with nuclear taking out a house the cry would go out to ban all nuclear. What a shame that would be if that was to happen.


14 posted on 05/09/2005 12:12:24 AM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

I'm with you...


15 posted on 05/09/2005 12:25:34 AM PDT by Deetes (Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

I was thinking the same- how long before it eats through those welds...

Sure would suck to be an engineer at that place today.

"Uh, Bob, could you come in a little early today- and bring lots of coffee..."


16 posted on 05/09/2005 5:24:29 AM PDT by Rocketwolf68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Oh.

Okay.


17 posted on 05/09/2005 11:57:09 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deetes; Doohickey; Cyber Liberty; maxwell; sionnsar

Crud.


18 posted on 05/09/2005 12:00:31 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson