If I recall correctly, he wasn't arrested for his 'speech' per se, he was arrested when he refused to leave after being asked to leave.
I believe this article is misleading on that point.
You're right! I forgot about the real cause of his arrest.
"If I recall correctly, he wasn't arrested for his 'speech' per se, he was arrested when he refused to leave after being asked to leave."
Haven't heard that one yet. Do you have a source? If he really was arrested for refusing to leave, then this whole discussion is moot.