No. It's just a theory. All of it is a guess. None of the fossils of "early man" have any human DNA. They're still animals.
Not only that, but in one huge evolutionary jump, the entire back bone and skull change from that of a monkey to that of a bear. No one even discusses that part. It doesn't fit the "theory."
I don't think you've studied evolution-
Cite a source. I think you have very different evolutionary lines. Who says that bears evolved from monkeys? No science course I ever took says that. I think you are many millions of years off.
Please cite a source for this amazing (and goofy) claim. We'll wait.
Not only that, but in one huge evolutionary jump, the entire back bone and skull change from that of a monkey to that of a bear. No one even discusses that part. It doesn't fit the "theory."
ROFL!!!! Actually, "no one even discusses that part" because it's so utterly false that it's just really, really funny. It's like, "no one wants to discuss that Methuselah couldn't fit the Tower of Babel onto his Ark..."
Just where *do* you get this complete horse manure? It's like you're getting your "knowledge" of evolutionary biology from a tab of LSD or something.
It always amuses me how the most vastly ignorant and uninformed/misinformed folks are the ones who are the most arrogant about their ability to critique hundreds of years of scientific discovery.
Confused creationists just crack me up.