[Howlin]

I've felt all along that a normal parent would have "gotten" the truth out of her son one way or the other.

Maybe they just consciously rejected any thought that might have even led them to even be the least bit suspicious.

I keep thinking about Sirhan Sirhan; at one of his parole hearings, he said he had been reading up on Bobby Kennedy, and he felt like, if Kennedy were alive, he'd want him to be released from prison after all these years.

That night Jay Leno said, "Talk about back luck: the one guy who would defend him and he killed him."

Scott Peterson killed more than Laci and Conner that night. It may be years and years from now, but the Petersons will "get it" one day; I just hope we don't have to listen to them moan and groan until then. Just go away.

[This Just In]

"Maybe they just conciously rejected any thought that might have even led them to even be the least bit suspicious."

Selective reasoning, it would certainly seem. As I said, the parents would have to assume some of the blame if their boy committed the crimes, which I believe he did.

I should point out that I am not one who believes that all parents are to blame for their childrens criminal behavior. With the Peterson's case, judging by the families conduct, theirs is an exception.